In_place_edit ends up with try catch block as content?

[adam]

I have a few in place edit fields in a table. but when i enter a null
value it now, promts me with the alert. ~BUT then enters the returned
rjs into the editable field: ~??

try {ry { alert(“not working”); } catch (e) { alert(‘RJS error:\n\n’ +
e.toString()); alert(‘alert(“not working”);’); throw e }

---

rhtml:

"><%= track.title %> <% if @edit %> " class="small_edit">edit <%= in_place_editor "#{dom_id(track)}_title", {:url => url_for(:action => "set_track_title", :id=> track), :class => 'editor', :external_control => "#{dom_id(track)}_title_edit"} %> <% end %>

---

Which call this method:

def set_track_title
@track = Track.find(params[:id])
@track.title = params[:value]
@message = “\n Title #{@track.errors[‘title’]}” unless @track.save

render :action => 'update_track.rjs'

end

=-----------------
Which calls this rjs template

page.alert ‘why wont you work…damn you rjs error!!’

[adam]

Most times whenever you see javascript being displayed from your rjs
template it’s
more often than not because you’re also using the :update option on
the AJAX call.
I haven’t looked at what the in place editor creates but I’d be
willing to bet that it’s using
:update by default so if you want to use rjs you’ll have to create
your own action to do
the update.

Hope that helps,

-Michael
http://javathehutt.blogspot.com

[adam]

Michael K. wrote:

Most times whenever you see javascript being displayed from your rjs
template it’s
more often than not because you’re also using the :update option on
the AJAX call.
I haven’t looked at what the in place editor creates but I’d be
willing to bet that it’s using
:update by default so if you want to use rjs you’ll have to create
your own action to do
the update.

Hope that helps,

-Michael
http://javathehutt.blogspot.com

Thanks for the reply.

The default method called from an in_place_edit field is

set_track_

So in my case its: set_track_title. I have added a few puts in there to
check that it get the params[:id] value and it seems to be fine.

One thing to note, while the logs and above puts suggest that i am
sending and receiving the params[:id]. When i view the action in firebug
the posted value is ‘value=’???