when i run benchmark_nop on Cell BE (PS3), i can see the speedup pretty
well.
When i take qa_fft.py as testcase i can’t see the speedup.
All SPEs run the same code for same time. So when i use 6 SPEs,
computing
takes the same time
as 1 SPE but it computes six times more.
I think i have to set gang_schedule() to true in gc_job_manager.h.
But how can i use this option in qa_fft.py?
On Fri, Jul 23, 2010 at 11:29:40AM +0200, matty wrote:
Hi,
when i run benchmark_nop on Cell BE (PS3), i can see the speedup pretty
well.
When i take qa_fft.py as testcase i can’t see the speedup.
All SPEs run the same code for same time. So when i use 6 SPEs, computing
takes the same time
as 1 SPE but it computes six times more.
gcell.jm_options() has only two parameters, in gc_job_manager.h there are 7
options.
Maybe, somebody can help me! I want to achieve, to see the speedup as well
with qa_fft.py as testcase.
Best Regards
Matty
I don’t believe that gang scheduling was ever implemented by the kernel.
But gang scheduling is implemented in gcell code, or i am wrong?
Do you mean the gcell kernel?
Ok, then i have to look for gc_job_manager_impl.cc.
But there are gang_scheduling constructs in gc_job_manager.h and the
matching SWIG file and in benchmark_nop.cc.
On Sat, Jul 24, 2010 at 09:40:55AM +0200, matty wrote:
But gang scheduling is implemented in gcell code, or i am wrong?
Do you mean the gcell kernel?
Ok, then i have to look for gc_job_manager_impl.cc.
But there are gang_scheduling constructs in gc_job_manager.h and the
matching SWIG file and in benchmark_nop.cc.
Matty
I mean the linux kernel. The spe_gang_context was defined in the
libspe2
interface, but I’m pretty sure that it doesn’t change any behavior.
IIRC, this was dicussed on the cbe-oss-dev mailing list, which was the
place for discussion of everything about Cell on Linux.
FWIW, you should be able to set the flag in opts like this: