In Ruby, the operation of
point - 20
20 - point
are to be implemented.
But the following code:
class Point
attr_accessor :x, :y
def initialize(x,y)
@x, @y = x, y
end
def -(q)
if (q.is_a? Fixnum)
return Point.new(@x - q, @y - q)
end
Point.new(@x - q.x, @y - q.y)
end
def -@
Point.new(-@x, -@y)
end
def *(c)
Point.new(@x * c, @y * c)
end
def coerce(something)
[self, something]
end
end
p = Point.new(100,100)
q = Point.new(80,80)
p (-p)
p p - q
p q - p
p p * 3
p 5 * p
p p - 30
p 30 - p
Output:
#<Point:0x2424e54 @x=-100, @y=-100>
#<Point:0x2424dc8 @x=20, @y=20>
#<Point:0x2424d3c @x=-20, @y=-20>
#<Point:0x2424cc4 @x=300, @y=300>
#<Point:0x2424c38 @x=500, @y=500>
#<Point:0x2424bc0 @x=70, @y=70>
#<Point:0x2424b20 @x=70, @y=70>
“30 - p” will actually be taken as “p - 30” by the coerce function. Can
it be made to work?
I am actually surprise that the “-” method won’t coerce the argument
this way:
class Fixnum
def -(something)
if (/* something is unknown class */)
a, b = something.coerce(self)
return -(a - b) # because we are doing a - b but we wanted b
- a, so it is negated
end
end
end
that is, the function returns a “negated version of a - b” instead of
just returning “a - b”.
My apologies for the brevity and lack of explanation (I’m about to try
to catch a train), but this might do the sort of thing that you want?
(I think for coerce to work as you’d expect you need the operands(?)
in the coerce array to be in the same order as in the calculation.
Sorry if that doesn’t make any sense! A fuller explanation will follow
quite a bit later if you need one.)
class Point
attr_accessor :x, :y
def initialize(x,y); @x, @y = x, y; end
def -(q)
return Point.new(@x - q.x, @y - q.y) if q.kind_of? Point
Point.new(@x - q, @y - q)
end
def *©; Point.new(@x * c, @y * c); end
def -@(); Point.new(-@x, -@y); end
def coerce(something); [Point::Coerce.new(something), self]; end
end
class Point::Coerce
attr_reader :value
def initialize(v); @value = v; end
def *§
puts “Point::Coerce #{@value} * #{p.inspect}”
Point.new(@value * p.x, @value * p.y)
end
def -§
puts “Point::Coerce #{@value} - #{p.inspect}”
Point.new(@value - p.x, @value - p.y)
end
end
p = Point.new(200,100)
q = Point.new(80,70)
puts
p p, q
puts
p (-p)
puts
p p - q
p q - p
puts
p p * 3
p 5 * p
puts
p p - 30
p 30 - p
On Mon, May 10, 2010 at 6:39 AM, Colin B.
[email protected] wrote:
end
puts
p (-p)
puts
p p - q
p q - p
puts
p p * 3
p 5 * p
puts
p p - 30
p 30 - p
While this explains the usage of the coerce method well, I’m not sure
that the answer to the original poster’s question is mu*
I may be wrong here, it’s early and I haven’t yet had a full cup of
coffee, but while multiplication of a point (vector) and a scalar
makes sense, I’m not sure that there is a conventional meaning to
subtraction (or addition) of a scalar and a vector.
Colin’s solution treats a scalar in this case as a unit point
multiplied by the scalar. If this is what’s wanted it can be done
without the separate Point::Coerce class
def coerce(something)
[Point.new(something, something), self]
end
–
Rick DeNatale
Blog: http://talklikeaduck.denhaven2.com/
Github: rubyredrick (Rick DeNatale) · GitHub
Twitter: @RickDeNatale
WWR: http://www.workingwithrails.com/person/9021-rick-denatale
LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/in/rickdenatale