How many worker_process do you like?

The number of worker_process seems to be relative with amount of CPUs?


Ren Xiaolei

On Fri, Mar 19, 2010 at 10:42 AM, 任晓磊 [email protected] wrote:

The number of worker_process seems to be relative with amount of CPUs?

True :slight_smile:

Cheers,
-agentzh

How many worker_process per CPU core do you like?

On Fri, Mar 19, 2010 at 2:58 PM, agentzh [email protected] wrote:

True :slight_smile:


Ren Xiaolei

On Fri, Mar 19, 2010 at 3:06 PM, 任晓磊 [email protected] wrote:

How many worker_process per CPU core do you like?

One :slight_smile:

I can get my core running 100% with a single nginx worker process that
itself is hitting my mysql database via ngx_drizzle :wink:

Cheers,
-agentzh

Should I increase buffer size to achieve block-free?
Else, one processor per CPU core might be not enough.

On Fri, Mar 19, 2010 at 3:10 PM, agentzh [email protected] wrote:

-agentzh


nginx mailing list
[email protected]
http://nginx.org/mailman/listinfo/nginx


Ren Xiaolei

On Fri, Mar 19, 2010 at 3:12 PM, 任晓磊 [email protected] wrote:

Should I increase buffer size to achieve block-free?
Else, one processor per CPU core might be not enough.

Yup, disk operations always block the current worker.

Cheers,
-agentzh

I’m sorry, I cannot understand such huge source.
Do you mean one worker can serve only one request at a time?

On Fri, Mar 19, 2010 at 3:53 PM, agentzh [email protected] wrote:

Yup, disk operations always block the current worker.


Ren Xiaolei

This forum is not affiliated to the Ruby language, Ruby on Rails framework, nor any Ruby applications discussed here.

| Privacy Policy | Terms of Service | Remote Ruby Jobs