How can I specify the location of the fragment cache?

I am using fragment caching - the cache gets stored under RAILS_ROOT/
tmp/cache/www.mysite.com but if someone goes to http://mysite.com (no
www) then, a second cache gets stored at RAILS_ROOT/tmp/cache/
mysite.com - from this point on, the cache is hit at both URL
locations but I end up with 2X the DB hits and 2X over-the-wire web
service calls etc I really need.

This is turning out to be really really expensive. How can I avoid
this?

Any ideas?

On Fri, 14 Sep 2007, raghus wrote:

I am using fragment caching - the cache gets stored under RAILS_ROOT/
tmp/cache/www.mysite.com but if someone goes to http://mysite.com (no
www) then, a second cache gets stored at RAILS_ROOT/tmp/cache/
mysite.com - from this point on, the cache is hit at both URL
locations but I end up with 2X the DB hits and 2X over-the-wire web
service calls etc I really need.

This is turning out to be really really expensive. How can I avoid
this?

You can ensure they always visit the non-www version of your domain
name. Here’s an Apache rewrite rule for that:

RewriteCond %{HTTP_HOST} !^mysite.com$ [NC]
RewriteRule ^(.*) http://mysite.com/$1 [L,R=301]


Greg D.
Cyberfusion Consulting
http://cyberfusionconsulting.com/

Any ideas?
Not a solution to your problem directly, but you may want to consider
301
redirecting all requests to mysite.com to www.mysite.com.

I know that Google will punish your page rankings if it sees the same
content in multiple domains…

As a side effect it would also solve your problem…

-philip

That’s an idea that would have the side-effect of solving my problem
yes, but I don’t believe Google will punish PR between www and a plain
site.com. As you say multiple domains: perhaps between alpha.com and
beta.com if there’s exactly the same content, then… maybe.

Greg D. wrote:

You can ensure they always visit the non-www version of your domain
name. Here’s an Apache rewrite rule for that:

RewriteCond %{HTTP_HOST} !^mysite.com$ [NC]
RewriteRule ^(.*) http://mysite.com/$1 [L,R=301]

Beware. If you have multiple sites running under the same domain this
will lead to trouble with cookies and IE. That is if you have both
example.com and anotherapp.example.com.


Cheers,

  • Jacob A.

You may be right… now that I think about it our problem was the
individual hostnames vs www.

It definitely punished us for that.