I am having a heck of a time understanding the new rest craze in rails.
what I think I understand so far:
1 rest is about the way we use http to access information on the
internet.
2 http was created with nouns and verbs in mind, but the only verbs that
are supported in browsers and server software today are ‘post’ and
‘get’. Other useful verbs include put and delete.
3 a url should only contain nouns. They should identify a resource.
Along with the url should be a ‘method’ which should contain a verb that
describes what we want to do with the resource.
I have done a lot of reading but thats the best I can come up with so
far…
And what I REALLY don’t understand is the new ActiveResource stuff in
rails. We want rails to be more rest oriented. We can’t rely on ‘put’
and ‘delete’ so rails tries to implement restful requests for us. But
all its really doing is tacking the verb onto the url for us. So why
cant the verb just be attached like ‘person/delete’. Why all the
semicolons and ampersands. And what makes this approach any different
than calling it an ‘action’?
Any help would be greatly appreciated.
Well… I’m not really answering your question about REST. Pretty new
thing for me and I have not gotten everything clearly.
Good info is at:
http://www.ryandaigle.com/articles/2006/06/30/whats-new-in-edge-rails-activeresource-is-here
But what the ActiveResource functionality by itself is more about how
you access REST data. At least it’s how I understand it. Other things
handle the creation of RESTful services.
Thus enabling you to access RESTful datastores from like say Amazon in
a similar way as you would access local database models.
If you make a REST model to Amazon called AmazonBook. You would be
able to do things like:
book = AmazonBook.find(097669400X)
book.name # Returns: “Agile Web D. with Rails”
book.author[0].name # Returns: “Dave T.”
Am I getting this right people??? Or am I misunderstanding
everything?!??!?
On 7/1/06, john [email protected] wrote:
3 a url should only contain nouns. They should identify a resource.
cant the verb just be attached like ‘person/delete’. Why all the
http://lists.rubyonrails.org/mailman/listinfo/rails
–
Jón Borgþórsson,
thank you for your reply. It did help me.
I still don’t understand what exactly is going on unfortunately. I
wonder especially why we need the strange urls. What is the difference
between a request like ‘amazonbook/1/edit’ and a request like
‘amazonbook/1;edit’?
I had read the article you pointed me to, but I re-read it just now. I
must be missing something important here I feel. I still have a hard
time understanding all of this.
With REST we can use a protocol that both machines and humans can use to
interact with information. Thats because its a protocol and not just a
bunch of words between slashes that a single website can interpret? Can
we now interact with other web services as if they were active records?
Is that what you meant?
I don’t know, maybe I should accept that Im just not able to even
formulate a proper question about ActiveResource and basically give up
and wait for more blogs and such.
But thanks for your help. Much appreciated!!!
On a side note: One of my favorite articles so far about REST was (don’t
laugh) ‘How I Explained REST To My Wife’:
http://naeblis.cx/rtomayko/2004/12/12/rest-to-my-wife
good stuff.
Good info is at:
http://www.ryandaigle.com/articles/2006/06/30/whats-new-in-edge-rails-activeresource-is-here
On 7/1/06, john [email protected] wrote:
What is the difference
between a request like ‘amazonbook/1/edit’ and a request like
‘amazonbook/1;edit’?
After reading DHH’s recent blog I wondered and am still wondering
exactly the same thing.
On a side note: One of my favorite articles so far about REST was (don’t
laugh) ‘How I Explained REST To My Wife’:
http://naeblis.cx/rtomayko/2004/12/12/rest-to-my-wife
What I got out of that article is the guy wants us to use standard
verbs (GET, PUT etc). DHH mentioned that in his slides, I believe.
I don’t get REST yet either.
Peter