Freq Xlating FIR Filter Question

When using a Freq. Xlating FIR filter with decimation and taps
both set to 1, what determines the practical lower limit
for the resolution of the freq change?

@(^.^)@ Ed

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Hi Ed!

Numerical accuracy of the exp(jN)*tap operation.
Usually, this accuracy is sufficient by far – why the question?

Greetings,
Marcus

On 14.04.2014 19:57, Ed Criscuolo wrote:

When using a Freq. Xlating FIR filter with decimation and taps both
set to 1, what determines the practical lower limit for the
resolution of the freq change?

@(^.^)@ Ed

_______________________________________________ Discuss-gnuradio
mailing list [email protected]
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss-gnuradio
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1
Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/

iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJTTE09AAoJEBQ6EdjyzlHtnfIIALF/0SFegTHY2153BDrRXY7X
NKFbVljfH38Zn2CnES9m9bYe4DvvapTRRUOzSjm0pqdk3E4LvgU8VutfEqZP1fZH
cRpzxjyoh7vnlUJuUba7dTI7rAS+S3NSghNAE7pm52Y9V8hIVY2qQpFF4AD5PEVg
DOoi76i4NDpSAzzhcuiGeQlSpOzeewLuko8o9yc+lvXe1+0Dxh2dSYclHFIIV4vU
i0kLa7TQcv7RUNn3uPPmh2a9P5q/OPO42z10JXVfYXsl9rl+rpRo6nt96OTBxeBH
vbrHjlcnUXFoDILKBWOtt9p6qw4znNx/Geh2LnZ0wuWItlUS12u7tlVkGKzFw58=
=pajO
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

This forum is not affiliated to the Ruby language, Ruby on Rails framework, nor any Ruby applications discussed here.

| Privacy Policy | Terms of Service | Remote Ruby Jobs