in function ngx_resolver_copy ,n = (n & 0x3f << 8) + *p;
should be n = ((n & 0x3f) << 8) + *p;otherwis ,& oprator will not work
correctlly.
thanks
On Mon, Nov 17, 2008 at 10:20:34AM +0800, [email protected] wrote:
in function ngx_resolver_copy ,n = (n & 0x3f << 8) + *p;
should be n = ((n & 0x3f) << 8) + *p;otherwis ,& oprator will not work correctlly.
Thank you very much.
I had missed it as it becomes apparent on big (>256 bytes) DNS
responses.
What is your full name to include in CHANGES log ?
Igor S. wrote:
On Mon, Nov 17, 2008 at 10:20:34AM +0800, [email protected] wrote:
in function ngx_resolver_copy ,n = (n & 0x3f << 8) + *p;
should be n = ((n & 0x3f) << 8) + *p;otherwis ,& oprator will not work correctlly.Thank you very much.
I had missed it as it becomes apparent on big (>256 bytes) DNS
responses.
What is your full name to include in CHANGES log ?
Isnt the same idea of
n = (n & 0x3f << 8) + *src;
should this be:
n = ((n & 0x3f << 8) + *src);
Sorry I might be wrong… but who knows 
Igor S. wrote:
On Tue, Nov 18, 2008 at 10:43:32PM +0100, Robert G. wrote:
Isnt the same idea of
n = (n & 0x3f << 8) + *src;should this be:
n = ((n & 0x3f << 8) + *src);
Sorry I might be wrong… but who knows
This is the same.
Meaning should I change it in my nginx source, or not?!
On Tue, Nov 18, 2008 at 10:43:32PM +0100, Robert G. wrote:
Isnt the same idea of
n = (n & 0x3f << 8) + *src;should this be:
n = ((n & 0x3f << 8) + *src);
Sorry I might be wrong… but who knows
This is the same.