Anyone else thing Gem Server documentation should work like this?
RDoc Generation by trans · Pull Request #16 · rubygems/rubygems · GitHub
Anyone else think Gem Server documentation should work like this?
https://github.com/rubygems/rubygems/pull/16https://github.com/rubygems/rubygems/pull/16
I really have no idea because I myself do not use rdoc nor gem server.
From the short description, that seems to improve a status quo though,
as it only adds a feature without breaking anything, right? In that
case, if true, I could not see why anyone would object it.
This looks like a good idea.
– Matma R.
W dniu 24 marca 2012 02:02 użytkownik Marc H.
[email protected] napisał:
On Fri, Mar 23, 2012 at 5:07 PM, Intransition [email protected]
wrote:
Anyone else think Gem Server documentation should work like this?
RDoc Generation by trans · Pull Request #16 · rubygems/rubygems · GitHub
+1 from me. I’ve had times where this would’ve been convenient. I was
running a gem server and the one gem who’s rdocs I wanted to view
didn’t have them. It would’ve been cool to just be able to click a
link and have the built automatically.