With UHD, how can I programmatically detect when transmit underruns have
occurred?
I see Us in the output both on the host and from the USRP2 serial port,
but I haven’t spotted an API to test for this condition.
-Marc
With UHD, how can I programmatically detect when transmit underruns have
occurred?
I see Us in the output both on the host and from the USRP2 serial port,
but I haven’t spotted an API to test for this condition.
-Marc
See recv async message:
http://www.ettus.com/uhd_docs/doxygen/html/classuhd_1_1device.html#afe4ec312d71c669fbd86ce9a7d350605
And the async metadata:
http://www.ettus.com/uhd_docs/doxygen/html/structuhd_1_1async__metadata__t.html
-Josh
Oh cool! When was that implemented? I missed it…
I assume there is no problem with timeout = 0?
Is the interface thread safe? read/write/recv_async?
–Eric
On 09/02/2010 01:54 PM, Marc E. wrote:
On Sep 2, 2010, at 12:23 PM, Josh B. wrote:
See recv async message: http://www.ettus.com/uhd_docs/doxygen/html/classuhd_1_1device.html#afe4ec312d71c669fbd86ce9a7d350605
And the async metadata: http://www.ettus.com/uhd_docs/doxygen/html/structuhd_1_1async__metadata__t.html
Thanks, Josh. Now that you mention it, I remember your announcement where that was added.
It looks like I’ll need another thread to watch for those messages, right?
That is one possibility. You can also poll for the messages by using a
timeout of zero. Depends on your application and what is most
convenient.
-josh
On Sep 2, 2010, at 12:23 PM, Josh B. wrote:
See recv async message: http://www.ettus.com/uhd_docs/doxygen/html/classuhd_1_1device.html#afe4ec312d71c669fbd86ce9a7d350605
And the async metadata: http://www.ettus.com/uhd_docs/doxygen/html/structuhd_1_1async__metadata__t.html
Thanks, Josh. Now that you mention it, I remember your announcement
where that was added.
It looks like I’ll need another thread to watch for those messages,
right?
-Marc
On 09/02/2010 01:46 PM, Eric S. wrote:
Oh cool! When was that implemented? I missed it…
http://old.nabble.com/UHD-Announcement---August-16th-2010-td29457066.html
I assume there is no problem with timeout = 0?
should be fine
Is the interface thread safe? read/write/recv_async?
You can have a separate thread for send, recv, async recv, control
(sets/gets). So thats fine, but dont (for example) use multiple threads
to call send, or multiple threads to set properties.
-josh
This forum is not affiliated to the Ruby language, Ruby on Rails framework, nor any Ruby applications discussed here.
Sponsor our Newsletter | Privacy Policy | Terms of Service | Remote Ruby Jobs