Debian patches not upstream


#1

Hello,

I’m preparing ruby-gnome2 0.18.1 and taking a look at some patches that
are not upstream in 0.18.1, some might be of interest.

http://t1r.net/~nohar/drag-signals.patch
adds dnd support to GtkTreeStore

http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=383309
adds “row-draggable” and “row-drop-possible” signals to Gtk::ListStore
and
Gtk::TreeStore, thus enabling users to use the Gtk high-level DND API

http://t1r.net/~nohar/xulrunner-1.9.patch
To link agains xulrunner 1.9

http://t1r.net/~nohar/gtkmozembed-rpath.patch
drop rpath definition from gtkmozembed

Feel free to comment/integrate any patch.

Regards,

Arnaud C.


#2

Hi,

In removed_email_address@domain.invalid
“[ruby-gnome2-devel-en] debian patches not upstream” on Wed, 25 Feb
2009 20:34:13 +0100,
Arnaud C. removed_email_address@domain.invalid wrote:

I’m preparing ruby-gnome2 0.18.1 and taking a look at some patches that
are not upstream in 0.18.1, some might be of interest.

http://t1r.net/~nohar/drag-signals.patch
adds dnd support to GtkTreeStore

http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=383309
adds “row-draggable” and “row-drop-possible” signals to Gtk::ListStore and
Gtk::TreeStore, thus enabling users to use the Gtk high-level DND API

Do you have a sample script to test the patch?

http://t1r.net/~nohar/xulrunner-1.9.patch
To link agains xulrunner 1.9

http://t1r.net/~nohar/gtkmozembed-rpath.patch
drop rpath definition from gtkmozembed

I’ve committed XULRunner 1.9 support inspired by the
patches.

Thanks,

kou