Convert complex SQL to ActiveRecord and Arel

Hi,

I have a fairly complex SQL statement I’d like to convert to AREL

SELECT count(matches.id), players.*
FROM clubs
INNER JOIN players ON players.club_id = clubs.id
INNER JOIN rankings ON rankings.player_id = players.id
INNER JOIN tournaments ON rankings.tournament_id = tournaments.id
LEFT OUTER JOIN matches ON (matches.p1_id = players.id OR
matches.p2_id = players.id)
AND clubs.id = 7
AND tournaments.id = 19
GROUP BY players.id

How would I do this?

On Aug 10, 2010, at 6:15 PM, jeroen wrote:

matches.p2_id = players.id)
AND clubs.id = 7
AND tournaments.id = 19
GROUP BY players.id

How would I do this?

One step at a time …

Even though you have the query Club-centric, you’re asking for
players.* so I’d start with the Player model:

Player.select(‘count(matches.id) as match_count, players.*’)

Then you have inner joins:
.joins([:club, { :rankings => :tournament }])

And then an outer join (this is a tricky one and depends on how you’ve
defined the associations):
.includes(:matches)

Looks like you already know the club and the tournament:
.where([‘clubs.id = ? AND tournaments.id = ?’, 7, 19])

And you want the count() function to behave:
.group(‘players.id’)

Then ask for all of 'em:
.all

That may not actually work, but it certainly ought to give you some
hints. (And there’s probably other ways to get the same information,
but you need to ask a better question to get a better answer.)

-Rob

Rob B.
[email protected] http://AgileConsultingLLC.com/
[email protected] http://GaslightSoftware.com/

Hi Rob,

I really appreciate your feedback.

One of the things I;m struggling with is to fetch a player’s matches
with Arel:

irb) Player.joins(:matches)
ActiveRecord::ConfigurationError: Association named ‘matches’ was not
found; perhaps you misspelled it?

A match does not have a player_id it does have p1_id and p2_id.
Hence the “JOIN matches ON (matches.p1_id = players.id OR
matches.p2_id = players.id)” in SQL

I’m already struggling to get a Player#has_many :matches going. I can
do it the old fashioned way using finder_sql but that doesn’t use Arel
so it hard to chain more things to it.

I dont know how to specify the join columns in in a Player.joins(…)
call.

Sorry if my questions aren’t clear, I just don’t have a clue where to
start, Arel docs & examples on this topic seem hard to find.

Cheers,

Jeroen

On Aug 11, 1:48 am, Rob B. [email protected]

On Aug 12, 2010, at 5:02 PM, jeroen wrote:

INNER JOIN players ON players.club_id = clubs.id
One step at a time …
you’ve
.all
Hi Rob,
A match does not have a player_id it does have p1_id and p2_id.
Sorry if my questions aren’t clear, I just don’t have a clue where to
start, Arel docs & examples on this topic seem hard to find.

Cheers,

Jeroen

Well, you’re discovering that SQL is hard for relations that aren’t
symmetric (i.e., your p1_id and p2_id). If you add a MatchPlayer
model, you can probably simplify your SQL and if you keep a ‘position’
you can still maintain which is “Player 1” and which is “Player 2” in
a match. The bare minimum is probably something like:

Club
id

Player
id
club_id

Tournament
id

Ranking
id
player_id
tournament_id

Match
id
tournament_id

MatchPlayer
match_id
player_id
position

And thus in AR:
Player
belongs_to :club
has_many :match_players
has_many :matches, :through => :match_players
Match
belongs_to :tournament

Player.select(‘count(matches.id) as match_count, players.*’)
.includes([:club, { :matches => :tournament }])
.where([‘clubs.id = ? AND tournaments.id = ?’, 7, 19])
.group(‘players.id’)
.all

I don’t think that this query needs Ranking at all (although it was
probably used to create the Match and MatchPlayer records).

-Rob

Rob B.
[email protected] http://AgileConsultingLLC.com/
[email protected] http://GaslightSoftware.com/

This forum is not affiliated to the Ruby language, Ruby on Rails framework, nor any Ruby applications discussed here.

| Privacy Policy | Terms of Service | Remote Ruby Jobs