Connect Model not to Controller named as pluarize of model but to another Controller

Rails
1

before ask you a my question,
i’m not good at english,
my description could be awakward;;

i’am practicing rails3.0 these days.
i’ve desinged RESTful app
but there is some question.

i’v e made “USER” model and “Login” controller.
login controller has ‘add_user’ and ‘login’ actions

and set route.rb up as below
resources:users controller =>‘login’

but it’s not working as i want to do
it doesn’t match localhost:3000/login/user with login/login
and match that with user/login

what should I do?

ps. As i’ve practiced rails, i thought that
Controller not named as pluarize of model is bad structure of app
is it real? do you think so two?

2

Controller is plural if you want all the RESTful actions including
index. It
is singular when you don’t need index. Because when a resource is
singular
there is no need to list them.

On Thu, Nov 18, 2010 at 3:20 PM, sukury47 [email protected] wrote:

Controller not named as pluarize of model is bad structure of app
http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-talk?hl=en.

–
Cheers,
Bala
RoR Developer Now Available for Hire

3

sukury47 wrote in post #962465:

ps. As i’ve practiced rails, i thought that
Controller not named as pluarize of model is bad structure of app
is it real? do you think so two?

Yes, it annoys me that there are so many examples for Rails like that.

In Rails, part of the beauty is the idea of convention over
configuration. Conform to the 90% case and life (and coding) is easy.

Yet so many “introductory” tutorials begin with a non-conforming case.

It wasn’t until I really looked at ALL the code generated by a simple

rails generate scaffold person first_name:string last_name:string

that it all started to make real sense.