Compile Ruby9i on Windows

Hi,

in my company we use Oracle and Windows :-(.

Now, I would like at least to start for some quick-and-dirty
solutions to use Ruby. Maybe my boss could be convinced it’s
worth a closer look.

I’m afraid, I don’t succeed to compile the
http://ruby9i.sourceforge.net/ library at all. I get loads
of errors the more I try. I easily managed to compile my own
OCI (Oracle from C) programs with MSVC (by the way: C
plugins, too).

I would build a project file of my own but as I see the Ruby
installation includes “.so” files. I don’t know what
restrictions to use to build DLLs that can be renamed to
that type.

Could anyone please give me a short description of what is
to do?

Thanks in advance,

Bertram

On Sat, 14 Jan 2006 17:38:19 +0100, Bertram S.
[email protected] wrote:

of errors the more I try. I easily managed to compile my own

Thanks in advance,

Bertram

A .so is a .dll. They’re compiled basically the same way, just remember
to
export the Init_* functions. (Or for qnd jobs, export all functions, you
can always optimize later). If you have the time, you might want to give
the file “rbconfig.rb” a read, pretty much everything the extension
configuration scripts use is there.

Also, a little bit of POSIX goes a long way. A lot of Makefile
generators
count on you using a sh-compatible shell, POSIX CLI tools, and gcc
compiler flags. You might try switching to a cygwin or mingw build of
ruby
if you plan to use extensions a lot.

David V.

On 1/14/06, Bertram S. [email protected] wrote:

of errors the more I try. I easily managed to compile my own

Thanks in advance,

Bertram

I only tried to make Ruby9i work for a short time, before deciding
that the Ruby-oci8 interface was more recently maintained, and more
popular:
http://www.jiubao.org/ruby-oci8/
I’m using this (on Windows and otherwise) for a number of production
tasks and Rails systems, and it works well. Conveniently, it also has
a binary download for Windows, so you won’t need to compile anything.

Hi,

Am Sonntag, 15. Jan 2006, 04:05:56 +0900 schrieb David V.:

A .so is a .dll. They’re compiled basically the same way, just remember to
export the Init_* functions. (Or for qnd jobs, export all functions, you
can always optimize later). If you have the time, you might want to give
the file “rbconfig.rb” a read, pretty much everything the extension
configuration scripts use is there.

Phew, I had to edit all the source files and put the
variable declarations in front of the statements.

Now it compiles and works great. Thank you!

You might try switching to a cygwin or mingw build of ruby
if you plan to use extensions a lot.

That will be the next step …

Bertram

On Mon, 16 Jan 2006 19:19:19 +0100, Bertram S.
[email protected] wrote:

of errors the more I try. I easily managed to compile my own
Phew, I had to edit all the source files and put the
variable declarations in front of the statements.

Oh dear. Someone dared to forget to code in that bleeding-edge
experimental new shiny C99 .

Arguably the thing I hated most about C. mutters about Borland Turbo C
colleges

Now it compiles and works great. Thank you!

Hoolay! If that was all that was needed, you’re lucky, I can’t get even
“nonsense” like iconv and fastcgi to build out of the box.

David V.

This forum is not affiliated to the Ruby language, Ruby on Rails framework, nor any Ruby applications discussed here.

| Privacy Policy | Terms of Service | Remote Ruby Jobs