Checking if a field is read-only

Hi,
Can you help me please and tell how can i check if a field is read only
in ruby?
i’m trying to write a automated script

Thanks

On 23/08/06, Ioana N. [email protected] wrote:

You could check to see if the object responds to “field=”.

irb(main):007:0> class Person
irb(main):008:1> attr_reader :name
irb(main):009:1> def initialize(name)
irb(main):010:2> @name = name
irb(main):011:2> end
irb(main):012:1> end
irb(main):014:0> p = Person.new(“Farrel”)
=> #<Person:0x2db0b48 @name=“Farrel”>
irb(main):015:0> p.name
=> “Farrel”
irb(main):016:0> p.respond_to?(“name=”)
=> false

On Aug 23, 2006, at 10:23, Farrel L. wrote:

On 23/08/06, Ioana N. [email protected] wrote:

Hi,
Can you help me please and tell how can i check if a field is read
only
in ruby?
i’m trying to write a automated script

You could check to see if the object responds to “field=”.

That’s the standard way this works, and is probably sufficient for
most cases. It’s important to remember that (in general) it’s not
variables/fields in Ruby which have properties like ‘read-only’ -
that behaviour is defined by methods of the enclosing class, and
methods to read and write variables aren’t limited to being named
after those variables. The follow Java-esque method would be
perfectly acceptable code:

class FooBar

def setMoose(squirrel)
@moose = squirrel
end
end

I’m not aware of any general way to know if a particular method call
will affect a particular variable or not, and I wouldn’t be surprised
if the problem turned out to be theoretically equivalent to the
halting problem. At first glance, an equivalence seems trivial; how
to determine if the variable @a is changed by the following method:
def foo
@a = “true” if undecidable_method
end

If you’re only worried about the possibility of writing to a
variable, though, then parsetree1 will give you a lot more coverage
than checking for responding to ‘name=’, though I expect there are
some pathological cases which might be difficult to catch.

matthew smillie