I’ve recently upgraded my box from Ubuntu Breezy to Dapper, and for
the life of me can’t figure out why I’m getting this exception thrown.
I’ve switched from Switchtower to Capistrano, and when I run rake
deploy I get this output:
** [update_code] exception while rolling back: NameError,
uninitialized constant Net::SSH::Transport::OSSL
/usr/local/lib/site_ruby/1.8/rubygems/custom_require.rb:21:in
require__': no such file to load -- openssl (LoadError) from /usr/local/lib/site_ruby/1.8/rubygems/custom_require.rb:21:inrequire’
from
/usr/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/net-ssh-1.0.8/lib/net/ssh/transport/ossl/services.rb:17
from
/usr/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/needle-1.3.0/lib/needle/container.rb:354:in
require' from /usr/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/needle-1.3.0/lib/needle/definition-context.rb:77:inrequire’
from
/usr/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/net-ssh-1.0.8/lib/net/ssh/transport/services.rb:137:in
register_services' from /usr/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/needle-1.3.0/lib/needle/container.rb:107:indefine’
from
/usr/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/needle-1.3.0/lib/needle/container.rb:250:in
namespace_define' from /usr/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/needle-1.3.0/lib/needle/container.rb:177:innamespace’
… 29 levels…
from
/usr/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/capistrano-1.1.0/lib/capistrano/cli.rb:221:in
execute!' from /usr/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/capistrano-1.1.0/lib/capistrano/cli.rb:12:inexecute!’
from /usr/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/capistrano-1.1.0/bin/cap:11
from /usr/bin/cap:18
I’ve googled around and haven’t seen anything particularly useful.
I’ve got an up-to-date-as-of-this-morning dapper, and the following
gems installed (pretty much rails + nitro):
actionmailer (1.1.5)
actionpack (1.11.2)
actionwebservice (1.0.0)
activerecord (1.13.2)
activesupport (1.2.5)
BlueCloth (1.0.0)
capistrano (1.1.0)
cmdparse (2.0.0)
daemons (0.4.2)
facets (1.2.0, 1.1.0, 1.0.3)
gen (0.29.0)
glue (0.29.0)
needle (1.3.0)
net-sftp (1.1.0)
net-ssh (1.0.8)
nitro (0.29.0)
og (0.29.0)
rails (1.0.0)
rake (0.7.0)
RedCloth (3.0.4, 3.0.3)
ruby-breakpoint (0.5.0)
rubygems-update (0.8.11)
sources (0.0.1)
syntax (1.0.0)
Anyone else have any of these problems?
- Jamie