On 19/07/10 20.01, [email protected] wrote:
- Re: Rewrite Performance Question (Juergen G.)
come some take a look at these rewrite rules if they are ok regarding
? ? ? ? ? ?rewrite ^(.*)$ http://www.forum.de:81 last;
Phillip B Oldham
should be taken regarding content, nor must you copy or show them to anyone.
? ? ? ? ? ?rewrite ^/(.*)$ http://www.forum.de:81/$1 permanent;
Also, in the second server it’s better to use usual names instead of regex:
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=KOI8-R
To: [email protected]
Thanks to Laurence Rowe.
On Thu, Jul 15, 2010 at 01:51:36AM +0300, bvidinli wrote:
set $test ""; return 444;
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
it would be nice if the config supports simple (extended)
Date: Mon, 19 Jul 2010 20:40:26 +0400
Date: Mon, 19 Jul 2010 18:00:55 +0000
From: Igor S.
*) Feature: the "proxy_cache_bypass", "fastcgi_cache_bypass", "uwsgi_cache_bypass", and "s?gi_cache_bypass" directives. *) Bugfix: nginx did not free memory in cache keys zones if there was an error during working with backend: the memory was freed only after inactivity time or on memory low condition.
Well, after this release, have I still to apply these patches?
I mean, it seems it’s a bug introduced in nginx-devel 0.8.31 and it’s 6
months old, so could you apply these patches on the official tree (or
tell me why not)?
Thanks for your work,