Bridge to ruby-forum is back?

Ruby
1

I was under the impression that the bridge had been severed. I was even
telling people they should come back to the list now that the
signal:noise ratio is fixed. Is the bridge back now?

2

Ryan D. [email protected] wrote:

I was under the impression that the bridge had been severed. I was
even telling people they should come back to the list now that the
signal:noise ratio is fixed. Is the bridge back now?

I don’t think the bridge is back (haven’t seen [email protected]
in recent headers). However, it subscription was recently fixed:
http://blade.nagaokaut.ac.jp/cgi-bin/scat.rb/ruby/ruby-talk/415043

3

On May 8, 2014, at 0:59, Eric W. [email protected] wrote:

Ryan D. [email protected] wrote:

I was under the impression that the bridge had been severed. I was
even telling people they should come back to the list now that the
signal:noise ratio is fixed. Is the bridge back now?

I don’t think the bridge is back (haven’t seen [email protected]
in recent headers). However, it subscription was recently fixed:
http://blade.nagaokaut.ac.jp/cgi-bin/scat.rb/ruby/ruby-talk/415043

Maybe it is only one-way then. It looks like the stuff here is showing
up there. I assumed it was two way given a recent influx of people for
whom I had previously unsubscribed.

4

Am 08.05.2014 09:59, schrieb Eric W.:

Ryan D. [email protected] wrote:

I was under the impression that the bridge had been severed. I was
even telling people they should come back to the list now that the
signal:noise ratio is fixed. Is the bridge back now?

I don’t think the bridge is back (haven’t seen [email protected]
in recent headers). However, it subscription was recently fixed:
http://blade.nagaokaut.ac.jp/cgi-bin/scat.rb/ruby/ruby-talk/415043

For clarification: only the subscription form on www.ruby-lang.org
stopped working for some time, the other subscription methods
have not been affected (“manual” subscriptions or subscription
via http://lists.ruby-lang.org/).

Regards,
Marcus

5

On Thu, May 8, 2014 at 10:39 AM, Ryan D. [email protected]
wrote:

http://blade.nagaokaut.ac.jp/cgi-bin/scat.rb/ruby/ruby-talk/415043

Maybe it is only one-way then. It looks like the stuff here is showing up there.
I assumed it was two way given a recent influx of people for whom I had previously
unsubscribed.

Then the status is unchanged compared to end of March.

Kind regards

robert