Bridge to ruby-forum is back?

I was under the impression that the bridge had been severed. I was even
telling people they should come back to the list now that the
signal:noise ratio is fixed. Is the bridge back now?

Ryan D. [email protected] wrote:

I was under the impression that the bridge had been severed. I was
even telling people they should come back to the list now that the
signal:noise ratio is fixed. Is the bridge back now?

I don’t think the bridge is back (haven’t seen [email protected]
in recent headers). However, it subscription was recently fixed:
http://blade.nagaokaut.ac.jp/cgi-bin/scat.rb/ruby/ruby-talk/415043

On May 8, 2014, at 0:59, Eric W. [email protected] wrote:

Ryan D. [email protected] wrote:

I was under the impression that the bridge had been severed. I was
even telling people they should come back to the list now that the
signal:noise ratio is fixed. Is the bridge back now?

I don’t think the bridge is back (haven’t seen [email protected]
in recent headers). However, it subscription was recently fixed:
http://blade.nagaokaut.ac.jp/cgi-bin/scat.rb/ruby/ruby-talk/415043

Maybe it is only one-way then. It looks like the stuff here is showing
up there. I assumed it was two way given a recent influx of people for
whom I had previously unsubscribed.

Am 08.05.2014 09:59, schrieb Eric W.:

Ryan D. [email protected] wrote:

I was under the impression that the bridge had been severed. I was
even telling people they should come back to the list now that the
signal:noise ratio is fixed. Is the bridge back now?

I don’t think the bridge is back (haven’t seen [email protected]
in recent headers). However, it subscription was recently fixed:
http://blade.nagaokaut.ac.jp/cgi-bin/scat.rb/ruby/ruby-talk/415043

For clarification: only the subscription form on www.ruby-lang.org
stopped working for some time, the other subscription methods
have not been affected (“manual” subscriptions or subscription
via http://lists.ruby-lang.org/).

Regards,
Marcus

On Thu, May 8, 2014 at 10:39 AM, Ryan D. [email protected]
wrote:

http://blade.nagaokaut.ac.jp/cgi-bin/scat.rb/ruby/ruby-talk/415043

Maybe it is only one-way then. It looks like the stuff here is showing up there.
I assumed it was two way given a recent influx of people for whom I had previously
unsubscribed.

Then the status is unchanged compared to end of March.

Kind regards

robert

This forum is not affiliated to the Ruby language, Ruby on Rails framework, nor any Ruby applications discussed here.

| Privacy Policy | Terms of Service | Remote Ruby Jobs