Benchmark of marshalling performance

I had problems w.r.t. performance of Marshal.dump in one of my
applications, so I tested if it was that better to dump objects by
sets
instead of one by one. The results are here:

http://www.jhaampe.org/software/marshal-perf-ruby

On 5/5/07, Sylvain J. [email protected] wrote:

I had problems w.r.t. performance of Marshal.dump in one of my
applications, so I tested if it was that better to dump objects by sets
instead of one by one. The results are here:

http://www.jhaampe.org/software/marshal-perf-ruby

Sylvain J.

Thanks for sharing this, it is also very comforting to know that for
an application that does few things but fast Ruby still seems fast
enough :slight_smile:

Salut
Robert

Thanks for sharing this, it is also very comforting to know that for
an application that does few things but fast Ruby still seems fast
enough :slight_smile:
Lol. The only real problem I have with Ruby’s performance is its GC …
I
have cycles that should be around 100ms and the GC will sometime take
ages.

This forum is not affiliated to the Ruby language, Ruby on Rails framework, nor any Ruby applications discussed here.

| Privacy Policy | Terms of Service | Remote Ruby Jobs