Benchmark of marshalling performance

Ruby
1

I had problems w.r.t. performance of Marshal.dump in one of my
applications, so I tested if it was that better to dump objects by
sets
instead of one by one. The results are here:

http://www.jhaampe.org/software/marshal-perf-ruby

2

On 5/5/07, Sylvain J. [email protected] wrote:

I had problems w.r.t. performance of Marshal.dump in one of my
applications, so I tested if it was that better to dump objects by sets
instead of one by one. The results are here:

http://www.jhaampe.org/software/marshal-perf-ruby

Sylvain J.

Thanks for sharing this, it is also very comforting to know that for
an application that does few things but fast Ruby still seems fast
enough :slight_smile:

Salut
Robert

3

Thanks for sharing this, it is also very comforting to know that for
an application that does few things but fast Ruby still seems fast
enough :slight_smile:
Lol. The only real problem I have with Ruby’s performance is its GC …
I
have cycles that should be around 100ms and the GC will sometime take
ages.