BaseFactory -- problem in reusable metaprogramming

I’m playing with this simple Factory pattern whereby the base class is
also the factory.

class X
class << self
alias :instance :new

  # Factory-pattern initialization.

  def new(type, *set, &yld)
      send(type, *set, &yld)
      raise "Not a known #{self} -- #{type}."

  # Subclasses should have standard #new methods.

  def inherited( subclass )
    class << subclass
      alias :new :instance



Using it…

class X
def self.y ; ; end
class Y < self

It works fine when I handle it manually like this. But when I try to
make this pattern reusable, creating a BaseFactory module to include in
X, it fails to alias correctly. Unfortunately it seems the #included
callback is invoked after inclusion is finished so I don’t see a way
to do it other than directly injecting the code into the class/module,
which bad OOP form to say the least. This would seem to be inconsitant
with #inherited which I think happens before the actual inheritance
takes place.

It also presents an interesting question about aliasing. Since aliasing
happens at the moment of invocation, it is essentially a “copy and
paste” sort of metacommand. For a dynamic language like Ruby, might we
not make better use of a dynamic variation of alias instead? But is
such a thing possible?


This forum is not affiliated to the Ruby language, Ruby on Rails framework, nor any Ruby applications discussed here.

| Privacy Policy | Terms of Service | Remote Ruby Jobs