All,
If you deploy multiple Mongrel instances, is it possible to have
affinity between a given session (e.g. session id) and a Mongrel
instance? How is that done?
Thanks,
Wes
All,
If you deploy multiple Mongrel instances, is it possible to have
affinity between a given session (e.g. session id) and a Mongrel
instance? How is that done?
Thanks,
Wes
On Jan 23, 2007, at 2:06 PM, Wes G. wrote:
If you deploy multiple Mongrel instances, is it possible to have
affinity between a given session (e.g. session id) and a Mongrel
instance? How is that done?
Hello Wes.
Session affinity is generally achieved at the load balancer level,
and Apache 2.2 supports this as well.
See mod_proxy - Apache HTTP Server Version 2.2 and search
locally for lbmethod for details.
Why do you want session affinity? It makes a ton of sense is HUGE
installations, but not so much for smaller ones.
–
– Tom M., CTO
– Engine Y., Ruby on Rails Hosting
– Reliability, Ease of Use, Scalability
– (866) 518-YARD (9273)
Why do you want session affinity? It makes a ton of sense is HUGE
installations, but not so much for smaller ones.
Because I ended up having to use a custom in-memory persistence scheme
to handle objects that were too large to place on the session (and would
cause Rails to crash during session serialization/deserialization). So
I have a hash which stores some larger things (parsed HTML and Excel
spreadsheet data) that I would like to keep around across requests given
the relatively high cost of generating them.
If I need to go to two or more Mongrels (which I almost certainly will),
the hashes will be private to each Mongrel instance (Ruby process) and
won’t be shared. Which of course, implies that I might end up
generating these objects up to N times where N is the number of Mongrel
instances.
So I would like to either take advantage of session affinity for a given
Mongrel process to be sure that a given artifact generated on behalf of
a given user and managed in my hash is only generated once.
If session affinity doesn’t work with Mongrel, then I guess I can look
into Drb.
Thanks,
Wes
Tom M. wrote:
Session affinity is generally achieved at the load balancer level,
and Apache 2.2 supports this as well.See mod_proxy - Apache HTTP Server Version 2.2 and search
locally for lbmethod for details.
Tom,
Thanks. Just looked at the Apache docs. and I see how this appears to
be supported.
Wes
Wes G. wrote:
…
If session affinity doesn’t work with Mongrel, then I guess I can look
into Drb.Thanks,
Wes
Check out memcached -
http://nubyonrails.com/articles/2006/08/17/memcached-basics-for-rails
sounds like your scheme implements a subset of what memcached already
does.
HTH,
-b
This forum is not affiliated to the Ruby language, Ruby on Rails framework, nor any Ruby applications discussed here.
Sponsor our Newsletter | Privacy Policy | Terms of Service | Remote Ruby Jobs