dougal
May 29, 2007, 1:40pm
#1
Hi folks.
I’m looking to emulate a feature I have implemented in Rails routing of
old, where the above URL could be used as so…
By year: http://douglasfshearer.com/blog/2007
By month: http://douglasfshearer.com/blog/2007/5
By Day: http://douglasfshearer.com/blog/2007/5/28
I’ve had a few attempts at this, but have so far failed to figure it
out.
Any suggestions?
dougal
May 29, 2007, 1:49pm
#2
I’d recommend against this for usability reasons and seo reasons…but
if you are really set on it there is an example in the agile book.
Though that uses traditional routing – restful may be a bit harder…
The domain.com/blog/id-permalink style makes much more sense and will
get your more google-fu.
On 5/29/07, Douglas S. [email protected] wrote:
By Day: http://douglasfshearer.com/blog/2007/5/28
–
http://robsanheim.com
dougal
May 29, 2007, 5:41pm
#3
why REST? will you be doing CRUD operations on them? if it’s just an
archive, then isn’t the routing you have already sufficient?
On May 29, 8:27 am, Douglas S. [email protected]
dougal
May 29, 2007, 2:27pm
#4
Rob S. wrote:
The domain.com/blog/id-permalink style makes much more sense and will
get your more google-fu.
I already have this implemented in old style routes, with named
permalinks for my posts.
The dated archive is to save having to paginate through 100s of posts,
and to make searching a little easier.
dougal
May 29, 2007, 6:01pm
#5
if you still want REST, (and i’m a rest noob so this may be very
wrong), perhaps something like
mydomain.com/blog/year/2007/month/5/day/28
On May 29, 11:48 am, Douglas S. <rails-mailing-l…@andreas -
dougal
May 29, 2007, 5:48pm
#6
Jeff Emminger wrote:
why REST? will you be doing CRUD operations on them? if it’s just an
archive, then isn’t the routing you have already sufficient?
A very good point.
I guess I just wondered if it was at all possible.
dougal
May 29, 2007, 6:50pm
#7
Jeff Emminger wrote:
mydomain.com/blog/year/2007/month/5/day/28
That would work, using nested resources. Have decided I was being
stupid, and have re-implemented my map.connect.
Ta.
dougal
May 29, 2007, 7:34pm
#8
On May 29, 11:50 am, Douglas S. <rails-mailing-l…@andreas -
s.net > wrote:
Jeff Emminger wrote:
mydomain.com/blog/year/2007/month/5/day/28
That would work, using nested resources. Have decided I was being
stupid, and have re-implemented my map.connect.
If it’s not too late, let me throw in my two cents
REST != map.resources
This is a common perception, because DHH’s posts about REST usually
included instructions about map.resources, a feature new to Rails 1.2
that made routing easier in some cases .
But you can have a 100% RESTful application just by using map.connect,
too. After all, map.resources is just shorthand for a bunch of named
routes (and named routes are just map.connect statements).
The url part after blog/ identifies your resource, right? So you can
be RESTful:
map.connect /blog/:year:/:month/:day, :controller => :blog, :action
=> :index
Then your BlogController has:
def index
month = params[:month]
year = params[:year]
day = params[:day]
@entries = # get entries here
end
I’m simplifying, but hopefully you get the idea. You can have a
RESTful architecture whether you use map.connect or map.resources.
Jeff
softiesonrails.com
dougal
May 29, 2007, 8:16pm
#9
Jeff C. wrote:
You can have a
RESTful architecture whether you use map.connect or map.resources.
Awesome reply Jeff, and a point very well made.
I think that you should make a blog entry of that, you have the spiel
down to a tee.
Cheers.
Dougal
http://douglasfshearer.com
dougal
November 29, 2010, 4:06pm
#10
I really enjoyed the article. It proved to be Very helpful to me and I
am sure to all the comment here!
http://www.dealsourcedirect.com/ion-tape2pc.html
dougal
May 29, 2007, 9:20pm
#11
Awesome reply Jeff, and a point very well made.
Thanks Douglas! Glad to help.
I think that you should make a blog entry of that, you have the spiel
down to a tee.
softiesonrails.com/tags/rest