It includes a patch for Ruby. I have already installed 1.8.4 from
source, and updated my PATH to look in /usr/local first, so I don’t
imagine that anything Apple does to “their” copy of Ruby will have any
impact on me, but I’m wondering if the changes to their Ruby is
something that needs to be done to 1.8.4 as well.
Thoughts?
Walter
On May 12, 2006, at 7:23 AM, Walter Lee D. wrote:
It includes a patch for Ruby. I have already installed 1.8.4 from
source, and updated my PATH to look in /usr/local first, so I don’t
imagine that anything Apple does to “their” copy of Ruby will have
any impact on me, but I’m wondering if the changes to their Ruby is
something that needs to be done to 1.8.4 as well.Thoughts?
You should go read the Ruby’s home page to find out.
–
Eric H. - [email protected] - http://blog.segment7.net
This implementation is HODEL-HASH-9600 compliant
Eric H. wrote:
You should go read the Ruby’s home page to find out.
And where on the front page does it mention anything about Apple’s
recent
OSX Security Update?
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Anyone-tried-the-recent-Mac-OS-X-Security-update--t1607883.html#a4368168
Sent from the RubyOnRails Users forum at Nabble.com.
I updated. I had previously installed ruby in /usr/local/bin and had put
in
a softlink from /usr/bin (where OSX has ruby) to /usr/local/bin/ruby.
The
update blew this away, stopped stuff working (like rubygems). So, I had
to
go in and restore the link. After that, all OK. So far…
Geoff
It says that 1.8.2 and previous have the problem, and that there is a
fix in 1.8.3 and later.
Thanks all!
Walter
On 5/12/06, Walter Lee D. [email protected] wrote:
It says that 1.8.2 and previous have the problem, and that there is a
fix in 1.8.3 and later.
Looks like Apple fixed it in-place: (after running system update)
/usr/bin/ruby -v
ruby 1.8.2 (2004-12-25) [powerpc-darwin8.0]
(vs:
/usr/local/bin/ruby -v
ruby 1.8.4 (2005-12-24) [powerpc-darwin8.6.0]
)
On 5/13/06, John T. [email protected] wrote:
/usr/local/bin/ruby -v
ruby 1.8.4 (2005-12-24) [powerpc-darwin8.6.0]
)
So that means we can use rails without installing local ruby copies?
I like that.
Wijnand
I did the update and Locomotive won’t run launch apps anymore. It
freezes the entire machine on an intel MacBook Pro.
soho:~/Sites/tracks jathayde$ ruby -v
ruby 1.8.4 (2005-12-24) [i686-darwin8.6.1]
Anyone else seen this behavior?
On May 12, 2006, at 10:23 AM, Walter Lee D. wrote:
Rails mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.rubyonrails.org/mailman/listinfo/rails
–
John A.
[email protected]
Meticulous | www.meticulous.com (work)
Rotoscope | www.rotoscope.com (sound: rock band)
Boboroshi & Kynz | www.boboroshiandkynz.com (sound: electronic)
Personal Weblog | www.boboroshi.com (play)
“Those who would give up essential Liberty, to purchase a little
temporary Safety, deserve neither Liberty nor Safety.”
- Benjamin Franklin (1706-1790)
Reply of the Pennsylvania Assembly to the
Governor
November 11, 1755
On Sunday, May 14, 2006, at 4:08 PM, John A. wrote:
I did the update and Locomotive won’t run launch apps anymore. It
freezes the entire machine on an intel MacBook Pro.soho:~/Sites/tracks jathayde$ ruby -v
ruby 1.8.4 (2005-12-24) [i686-darwin8.6.1]Anyone else seen this behavior?
Fixed now. Download the latest (2.0.7) from http://locomotive.raaum.org
Best,
-r
Wijnand W. wrote:
So that means we can use rails without installing local ruby copies?
I like that.
what if i installed ruby from darwinport and i had removed my original
ruby from macosx? my ruby is in /opt/local/bin/ruby
id-ruby:~ arie$ which ruby
/opt/local/bin/ruby
id-ruby:~ arie$ ruby -v
ruby 1.8.4 (2005-12-24) [powerpc-darwin8.0.0]
id-ruby:~ arie$
will there be no problem if i update it? sorry i’ve no time to try it
myself.
–
Arie Kusuma A. A.K.A Arie A.K.A ariekeren / YM! = riyari3
http://ariekusumaatmaja.wordpress.com
Yahoo | Mail, Weather, Search, Politics, News, Finance, Sports & Videos # Indonesia Ruby Society
IndoForums.com is for sale | HugeDomains # Sinau boso karo wong gendeng
500 baris di PHP dkk VS 1 baris di Ruby dkk
300 baris di Java dkk VS 1 baris di Ruby dkk
Macih ngotot pake (as|ph)p? haree geneee???
On May 13, 2006, at 1:29 AM, Wijnand W. wrote:
(vs:
/usr/local/bin/ruby -v
ruby 1.8.4 (2005-12-24) [powerpc-darwin8.6.0]
)So that means we can use rails without installing local ruby copies?
I like that.
Rails doesn’t make use of $SAFE. It will work exactly the same after
the update as it did before.
–
Eric H. - [email protected] - http://blog.segment7.net
This implementation is HODEL-HASH-9600 compliant
Thanks 
Working great now. (sorry on the late reply).
On May 14, 2006, at 10:39 PM, Ryan R. wrote:
Fixed now. Download the latest (2.0.7) from http://
source, and updated my PATH to look in /usr/local first, so I
[email protected]
Boboroshi & Kynz | www.boboroshiandkynz.com (sound: electronic)Posted with http://DevLists.com. Sign up and save your mailbox.
Rails mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.rubyonrails.org/mailman/listinfo/rails
–
John A.
[email protected]
Meticulous | www.meticulous.com (work)
Rotoscope | www.rotoscope.com (sound: rock band)
Boboroshi & Kynz | www.boboroshiandkynz.com (sound: electronic)
Personal Weblog | www.boboroshi.com (play)
“Those who would give up essential Liberty, to purchase a little
temporary Safety, deserve neither Liberty nor Safety.”
- Benjamin Franklin (1706-1790)
Reply of the Pennsylvania Assembly to the
Governor
November 11, 1755
On May 12, 2006, at 7:07 PM, Schmo wrote:
Thoughts?
You should go read the Ruby’s home page to find out.
And where on the front page does it mention anything about Apple’s
recent
OSX Security Update?
I’m specifically responding to:
I’m wondering if the changes to their Ruby is something that
needs to be done to 1.8.4 as well
–
Eric H. - [email protected] - http://blog.segment7.net
This implementation is HODEL-HASH-9600 compliant
This forum is not affiliated to the Ruby language, Ruby on Rails framework, nor any Ruby applications discussed here.
Sponsor our Newsletter | Privacy Policy | Terms of Service | Remote Ruby Jobs