Any rough ETA on SPDY/3 & push?

Contemplating switching my site over to Jetty to take advantage of
spdy/3
and push, but would rather stay with nginx really…

Is there a “rough” ETA on spdy3 in nginx? 1 month? 6 months? 2 years?

Thanks, sorry if this is a frequent request…

Posted at Nginx Forum:
http://forum.nginx.org/read.php?2,243684,243684#msg-243684

On Oct 14, 2013, at 8:01 PM, codemonkey [email protected] wrote:

Contemplating switching my site over to Jetty to take advantage of spdy/3
and push, but would rather stay with nginx really…

Is there a “rough” ETA on spdy3 in nginx? 1 month? 6 months? 2 years?

Thanks, sorry if this is a frequent request…

It is!

Considering it, but frankly, for a better ETA wouldn’t reject a
corporate sponsor
if there’s anybody here who’d be open to sponsoring an implementation
similar to

http://barry.wordpress.com/2012/06/16/nginx-spdy-and-automattic/

:slight_smile:

On 10/14/2013 9:37 AM, Andrew A. wrote:

Considering it, but frankly, for a better ETA wouldn’t reject a corporate
sponsor
if there’s anybody here who’d be open to sponsoring an implementation similar to

http://barry.wordpress.com/2012/06/16/nginx-spdy-and-automattic/

How much capital would you need to do this? I’d contribute to a
crowd-funding campaign for this and I can likely get work to match or
beat what I put in.

On 10/19/2013 5:07 PM, Darren P. wrote:

On 10/14/2013 9:37 AM, Andrew A. wrote:

http://barry.wordpress.com/2012/06/16/nginx-spdy-and-automattic/

How much capital would you need to do this? I’d contribute to a
crowd-funding campaign for this and I can likely get work to match or
beat what I put in.

I was quite serious about this offer. Is it some kind of faux pas
throwing money at an open source project?

On Oct 22, 2013, at 11:37 AM, Darren P.
[email protected] wrote:

On 10/19/2013 5:07 PM, Darren P. wrote:

On 10/14/2013 9:37 AM, Andrew A. wrote:

http://barry.wordpress.com/2012/06/16/nginx-spdy-and-automattic/

How much capital would you need to do this? I’d contribute to a
crowd-funding campaign for this and I can likely get work to match or
beat what I put in.

I was quite serious about this offer. Is it some kind of faux pas throwing
money at an open source project?

It isn’t. Let’s move if off the list, though, as it’s a topic which is
separate from
technical discussions :slight_smile:

spdy/2 support has been removed from the Firefox code base (
https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=912550 ) and >= Firefox 27 will
only support >= spdy/3. Firefox 27 will be released in January 2014 (
https://wiki.mozilla.org/RapidRelease/Calendar ) so there is some urgency in
getting spdy/3(.1) support into nginx.

Just the heads up: It seems the latest Chrome beta (32.0.1700.14) has
also removed support for spdy/2. Spdy is no longer enabled in Chrome on
nginx-based sites, and all sites that do work run spdy/3 or later
(according to chrome://net-internals/#spdy).

spdy/2 support has been removed from the Firefox code base (
https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=912550 ) and >= Firefox 27
will
only support >= spdy/3. Firefox 27 will be released in January 2014 (
https://wiki.mozilla.org/RapidRelease/Calendar ) so there is some
urgency in
getting spdy/3(.1) support into nginx.

Posted at Nginx Forum:
http://forum.nginx.org/read.php?2,243684,244199#msg-244199

Hey,

spdy/2 support has been removed from the Firefox code base (
https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=912550 ) and >= Firefox 27 will
only support >= spdy/3. Firefox 27 will be released in January 2014 (
https://wiki.mozilla.org/RapidRelease/Calendar ) so there is some urgency in
getting spdy/3(.1) support into nginx.

Just the heads up: It seems the latest Chrome beta (32.0.1700.14) has
also removed support for spdy/2. Spdy is no longer enabled in Chrome on
nginx-based sites, and all sites that do work run spdy/3 or later
(according to chrome://net-internals/#spdy).

Actually, after some convincing [0], both Firefox [1] & Chrome [2]
guys were nice enough to give us a bit more time and revert those
changes, so SPDY/2 will stay around for one more release cycle (and be
retired in late February).

[0] https://groups.google.com/d/msg/spdy-dev/XDudMZSq3e4/oqklqhoouAsJ
[1] https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=912550
[2] https://code.google.com/p/chromium/issues/detail?id=318651

Best regards,
Piotr S.

Ist there any new spdy code available for testing?
I can’t find any new code in the version control since spdy/2.

Since RHEL 6.5 / Centos 6.5 (currently building but openssl 1.0.1
available
in CR repro) this major distibutions are also capable to run spdy.

Posted at Nginx Forum:
http://forum.nginx.org/read.php?2,243684,244984#msg-244984

This forum is not affiliated to the Ruby language, Ruby on Rails framework, nor any Ruby applications discussed here.

| Privacy Policy | Terms of Service | Remote Ruby Jobs