I’m sorry I’ll probably keep hitting all those points while I’m writing
integration specs.
Ok so would it be possible to have a way to configure the underlying
type
which methods it needs to redefine with a new operator
public class SomeClass{
public void MyMethod(){
}
}
public class Inheritor : SomeClass {
public new void MyMethod(){
//some new logic here
}
}
ok… makes sense. I’ll add it to the distant future features list :)And
if
it doesn’t actually really invoke the method on the Inheritor then the
redefine_method probably doesn’t make much sense to implement.
In principle, this is absolutely something that could be done (though I
wouldn’t expect we would do it any time soon).
but, this doesn’t do what I think you want. Previously-compiled calls
to SomeClass.MyMethod won’t actually end up going to Inheritor.MyMethod
even if the object is of type Inheritor. The base method would have to
be defined as “virtualâ€, or the new method will end up in a new slot on
the method table.
From: [email protected]
[mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Ivan Porto
Carrero
Sent: Thursday, May 14, 2009 12:23 PM
To: ironruby-core
Subject: [Ironruby-core] aaah yes … clr interop
I’m sorry I’ll probably keep hitting all those points while I’m writing
integration specs.
Ok so would it be possible to have a way to configure the underlying
type which methods it needs to redefine with a new operator
public class SomeClass{
public void MyMethod(){
}
}
public class Inheritor : SomeClass {
public new void MyMethod(){
//some new logic here
}
}