Check it out.
On Fri, Feb 23, 2007 at 01:36:09PM +0900, William S. wrote:
Check it out.
That would require using MS Windows. When is someone going to port it
the other way – to FreeBSD? That might be interesting.
Then again, I doubt I’d be able to tear myself away from Vim long enough
to give it a fair shake.
----- “Chad P.” [email protected] wrote:
On Fri, Feb 23, 2007 at 01:36:09PM +0900, William S. wrote:
Check it out.
That would require using MS Windows. When is someone going to port
it
the other way – to FreeBSD? That might be interesting.
Er…you mean to Linux, right :-). When it gets to Linux, I’ll give it a
go.
JB
Hi,
2007/2/23, Ruby A. [email protected]:
I’ve downloaded and tried e-texteditor some weeks ago and I found that it lacks a file explorer view.
Is it planned to have such a feature ?
That’s called project management, and that was put in a few weeks ago
too. You might want to give it another try. I bought the software
and am a very happy user so far.
Alexander’s a very responsive coder, and I haven’t had any problems with
e.
Bye !
I’ve downloaded and tried e-texteditor some weeks ago and I found that
it lacks a file explorer view.
Is it planned to have such a feature ?
CM.
That’s called project management, and that was put in a few weeks ago
too. You might want to give it another try. I bought the software
and am a very happy user so far.
I’ve just made another try. And the project management covers my need
:-).
Some questions :
- I haven’t found a way to change the font size for the project
management view (I’m using a 1600x1200 screen so I have to adjust the
font size in order to have some comfort) - What is the easiest way to install Cygwin which is required for the
bundle feature. My station is not connected directly to Internet. So I
need a standalone package (the lightest posible).
Alexander’s a very responsive coder, and I haven’t had any problems with e.
Great.
CM.
Then again, I doubt I’d be able to tear myself away from Vim long enough
to give it a fair shake.
I did. There are definitely places where vi wins, but TextMate’s
pretty awesome. It’s my default editor these days.
On Feb 23, 2007, at 10:16 AM, Giles B. wrote:
And a little bird tells me that the book for it will ship early next week:Then again, I doubt I’d be able to tear myself away from Vim long
enough
to give it a fair shake.I did. There are definitely places where vi wins, but TextMate’s
pretty awesome. It’s my default editor these days.
http://www.pragmaticprogrammer.com/titles/textmate/index.html
(Amazon already has it in stock.)
James Edward G. II
On Sat, Feb 24, 2007 at 01:30:06AM +0900, Jonas H. wrote:
to give it a fair shake.
i wonder, with all the fame it got, why the textmate guys dont recode
it based on QT4 and add skinning and make it feel native like it is on
os x. its slow now and i cant imagen it getting so much slower ;p but
its a great and very productive tool.
I’m just wondering whether E is shipping with a bunch of Textmate
bundles
taken without permission from the actual Textmate app. Anyone know?
Disclaimer: I use Vim, and like it. Textmate is just a curiosity to me.
Jonas H.
–Greg
Chad P. wrote:
i wonder, with all the fame it got, why the textmate guys dont recode
it based on QT4 and add skinning and make it feel native like it is on
os x. its slow now and i cant imagen it getting so much slower ;p but
its a great and very productive tool.
–
Jonas H.
www : http://www.Jonas-Hartmann.com
eMail : [email protected]
icq : 13971744
skype : ionas82
home : +49 (0)6071 2 79 45 97 (AB)
mobile : +49 (0)160 99 2 44 679 (SMS)
I’m just wondering whether E is shipping with a bunch of Textmate bundles
taken without permission from the actual Textmate app. Anyone know?
“Allan was very positive about the prospect of me making the editor
compatible with textmate, and he had no problems with me using the
textmate bundles. Having more people, on more platforms, to use and
improve the bundles, could only make them even more powerful and
comprehensive.”
Source: 人気の自動車保険を口コミ・相場からランキングでご紹介!
Regards,
Rimantas
Hi –
On Fri, 23 Feb 2007, William S. wrote:
That’s funny – for the following reason: the second computer I used,
in 1972, was a PDP-10, and the text editor I used was called E. When
you started it up, it said:
*****************************
This is the Yale editor, E!
*****************************
and when you did something illegal, it said:
*****************************
No can do.
*****************************
which lingered on the screen for a second or two before your document
reappeared.
Just typing those out and looking at them is a quasi-Proustian
experience for me… 
David
On Feb 23, 2007, at 10:50 AM, Gregory S. wrote:
I’m just wondering whether E is shipping with a bunch of Textmate
bundles
taken without permission from the actual Textmate app. Anyone know?
TextMate’s bundles are open source, unlike the application. No rules
are broken here.
Allan Odgaard, the creator of TextMate, has been supportive of the e
editor effort.
James Edward G. II
On Sat, Feb 24, 2007, Jonas H. wrote:
Chad P. wrote:
i wonder, with all the fame it got, why the textmate guys dont recode
it based on QT4 and add skinning and make it feel native like it is on
os x. its slow now and i cant imagen it getting so much slower ;p but
its a great and very productive tool.
TextMate is slow? What part(s)?
Ben
Does anyone know if e supports Textmate-like word-completion? (I should
say
emacs-like) I didn’t find any documentation for it, but it seems to me
that’s one of the first things that you would hype 
Mushfeq.
----- “William S.” [email protected] wrote:
http://www.e-texteditor.com/index.html
Check it out.
Btw, for Linux, has anyone tried Scribes? (http://scribes.sf.net)
In this month’s Linux journal, they mention it as an editor for Linux
very similar to textmate. I don’t use textmate (not enough to make me
leave Linux behind), so can’t speak to how similar it actually is. Can
anyone on the list?
Thanks,
JB
Ben B. wrote:
TextMate is slow? What part(s)?
“Find in Project” regularly takes upwards of 60 seconds for me, during
which TextMate is completely unresponsive, its memory usage rockets from
30 MB up to over 900 MB (!), and every other application I’m running
slows down to the point of near-unusability (probably due to the memory
usage).
It’s also a good deal slower than TextWrangler at opening large text
files (say, over 8 MB).
Having said that, it’s still the only text editor I use. It’s a
fantastic piece of software. I wouldn’t mind seeing Find in Project
speeded up in the next version, though. 
On Sat, Feb 24, 2007 at 01:56:42AM +0900, James Edward G. II wrote:
On Feb 23, 2007, at 10:50 AM, Gregory S. wrote:
I’m just wondering whether E is shipping with a bunch of Textmate
bundles taken without permission from the actual Textmate app. Anyone
know?TextMate’s bundles are open source, unlike the application. No rules
are broken here.Allan Odgaard, the creator of TextMate, has been supportive of the e
editor effort.
Ah, good to know. I retract all aspersions cast.
James Edward G. II
–Greg
On Feb 23, 11:05 am, Chris G. [email protected] wrote:
Ben B. wrote:
TextMate is slow? What part(s)?
“Find in Project” regularly takes upwards of 60 seconds for me, during
which TextMate is completely unresponsive, its memory usage rockets from
30 MB up to over 900 MB (!), and every other application I’m running
slows down to the point of near-unusability (probably due to the memory
usage).
How many files are in your project? How big are all those files
(aggregate)? What machine is this running on? How much physical RAM do
you have? How many other applications are you running? How much free
disk space do you have?
Not trying to be defensive, curious for the benchmark data point.
On 2/23/07 10:27 AM, in article
[email protected], “James Edward
Gray
II” [email protected] wrote:
And a little bird tells me that the book for it will ship early next week:http://www.pragmaticprogrammer.com/titles/textmate/index.html
(Amazon already has it in stock.)
I’m off to place my order right now – I’ve been waiting for it!