Or does anybody prefer fastcgi/fcgi? I'm using webrick for development, but plan on using scgi when I switch to production (because it appears to be an update to fastcgi, and I couldn't get fastcgi working anyhow). thanks csn __________________________________ Yahoo! Mail - PC Magazine Editors' Choice 2005 http://mail.yahoo.com
on 2005-11-21 04:33
on 2005-11-21 06:18
I'm working with FastCGI for the time being, but I too plan to move to SCGI when I find a couple minutes in which to do so. Also, TextDrive's RailsBase will be *all* SCGI, it's definitely going to get a lot of production use there. Whatever works for you, go for it, but SCGI does seem preferrable to FastCGI. Seems simpler to set up, too. Jacob
on 2005-11-21 18:29
On 11/20/05, CSN <email@example.com> wrote: > Or does anybody prefer fastcgi/fcgi? I'm now using SCGI for all my production sites. It's simple to configure and I haven't had any reliability issues. Most of the sites run on lighttpd, though one runs on Apache with cgi2scgi.
on 2005-11-22 03:41
I'm using both. In one case (Textdrive) FCGI was already set up, so that was easy. In another it wasn't, so SCGI proved far easier to deal with. SCGI has been great. -- Chris Boone http://hypsometry.com/ : website edification http://uvlist.org/ : free classifieds for the Upper Valley
on 2005-11-22 07:50
I'd like to hear a back-poll on this... each of you : Windows or linux? Which version/distribution? Thanks!
on 2005-11-22 15:09
On 11/22/05, Peter Fitzgibbons <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote: > I'd like to hear a back-poll on this... > each of you : Windows or linux? Which version/distribution? Uh, none of the above. ;) Textdrive runs FreeBSD. The other app is served from OS X Server. In both cases Apache's receiving the request and proxying it to lighttpd. -- Chris Boone http://hypsometry.com/ : website edification http://uvlist.org/ : free classifieds for the Upper Valley
on 2005-11-22 18:59
I run SCGI on Windows 2000 Server + Apache2. Runs like a dream. Its fast in development mode and even faster in production.
on 2005-11-22 19:07
On 11/21/05, Peter Fitzgibbons <email@example.com> wrote: > I'd like to hear a back-poll on this... > each of you : Windows or linux? Which version/distribution? OpenBSD for the lighttpd sites. The Apache site is some version of Linux running in a VPS.
on 2005-11-22 20:51
--- Chris Boone <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote: > > In both cases Apache's receiving the request and > proxying it to lighttpd. What do you guesstimate the performance difference to be, versus using only Lighttpd? I'm thinking of trying Lighttpd, but will probably have to keep Apache around. thanks csn > __________________________________ Yahoo! FareChase: Search multiple travel sites in one click. http://farechase.yahoo.com
on 2005-11-22 23:04
HI Jin, How do you run SCGI ? Do you run it as a service ? Where did you get your binaries... I think I'm having trouble with binary version or something.
on 2005-11-22 23:20
Yes, I run SCGI as a service. All you need to do is adopt the instiki instructions, located here: http://www.instiki.org/show/Running+as+a+Windows+Service For reference, here are my registry keys: AppDirectory = (path to your web app, not the public directory but the root of the rails app) Application = c:\ruby\bin\ruby.exe c:\path_to_your_webapp\script\scgi_service Everything else I got from zedshaw's website, http://www.zedshaw.com/projects/scgi_rails/index.html if you are looking for a built mod_scgi.so file, check out Curt Hibbs' build here: http://www.zedshaw.com/projects/scgi_rails/win32.html The other essential part is to hook it up to Apache2, here is the relevant part of my httpd.conf: #Ruby/RAILS LoadModule scgi_module modules/mod_scgi.so <VirtualHost *:80> AddDefaultCharset utf-8 ServerAdmin email@example.com DocumentRoot "C:/path_to_your_webapp/public" ServerName www.blah.com <http://www.blah.com> ErrorDocument 500 /500.html ErrorDocument 404 /404.html # handle all requests throug SCGI SCGIMount / 127.0.0.1:9999 <http://127.0.0.1:9999> # matches locations with a dot following at least one more characters, that is, things like *,html, *.css, *.js, which should be delivered directly from the filesystem <LocationMatch \..+$> # don't handle those with SCGI SCGIHandler Off </LocationMatch> <Directory "C:/path_to_your_webapp/public"> Options +FollowSymLinks Order allow,deny allow from all </Directory> </VirtualHost> Hope that helps, Jin