Forum: Ruby Re: Zed and Luis drop the bomb on Ruby's poor performance

Announcement (2017-05-07): www.ruby-forum.com is now read-only since I unfortunately do not have the time to support and maintain the forum any more. Please see rubyonrails.org/community and ruby-lang.org/en/community for other Rails- und Ruby-related community platforms.
2cf408af3f08d3575c9cd7697158a8f1?d=identicon&s=25 Jamal Mazrui (Guest)
on 2006-05-22 16:16
(Received via mailing list)
What is the current time line for Ruby 2.0 and the byte code compiler?

Jamal
58479f76374a3ba3c69b9804163f39f4?d=identicon&s=25 Eric Hodel (Guest)
on 2006-05-22 23:06
(Received via mailing list)
On May 22, 2006, at 7:15 AM, Jamal Mazrui wrote:

> What is the current time line for Ruby 2.0 and the byte code compiler?

There are no plans for a byte code compiler.

--
Eric Hodel - drbrain@segment7.net - http://blog.segment7.net
This implementation is HODEL-HASH-9600 compliant

http://trackmap.robotcoop.com
3d333b0012928f3dd5a6861cb09ad683?d=identicon&s=25 Kris Leech (Guest)
on 2006-05-22 23:29
There is YARV I think that makes bytecode and there is JRuby which at
some point may create bytecode (Java), there is a a .NET project to
allow ruby to compiled to bytecode.

I think YARV is the Ruby 2 VM you are refering to.

Eric Hodel wrote:
> On May 22, 2006, at 7:15 AM, Jamal Mazrui wrote:
>
>> What is the current time line for Ruby 2.0 and the byte code compiler?
>
> There are no plans for a byte code compiler.
>
> --
> Eric Hodel - drbrain@segment7.net - http://blog.segment7.net
> This implementation is HODEL-HASH-9600 compliant
>
> http://trackmap.robotcoop.com
58479f76374a3ba3c69b9804163f39f4?d=identicon&s=25 Eric Hodel (Guest)
on 2006-05-23 00:27
(Received via mailing list)
On May 22, 2006, at 2:29 PM, Kris Leech wrote:

> allow ruby to compiled to bytecode.
>
> I think YARV is the Ruby 2 VM you are refering to.

Byte code interpreter, yes, compiler (something that outputs compiled
ruby files), no.

PS: Don't top post.

--
Eric Hodel - drbrain@segment7.net - http://blog.segment7.net

A: Yes
Q: Is top-posting bad?
  ? Derek Milhous Zumsteg
3d333b0012928f3dd5a6861cb09ad683?d=identicon&s=25 Kris Leech (Guest)
on 2006-05-23 09:41
I think by bytecode compiler he means something that compiles (ie.
makes) bytecode. Its just mis-worded slightly... He said ruby 2 and that
is supposed to support bytecode, were on 1.9 now, so not long to go :)

Eric Hodel wrote:
> On May 22, 2006, at 2:29 PM, Kris Leech wrote:
>
>> allow ruby to compiled to bytecode.
>>
>> I think YARV is the Ruby 2 VM you are refering to.
>
> Byte code interpreter, yes, compiler (something that outputs compiled
> ruby files), no.
>
> PS: Don't top post.
>
> --
> Eric Hodel - drbrain@segment7.net - http://blog.segment7.net
>
> A: Yes
> Q: Is top-posting bad?
>   � Derek Milhous Zumsteg
58479f76374a3ba3c69b9804163f39f4?d=identicon&s=25 Eric Hodel (Guest)
on 2006-05-23 20:55
(Received via mailing list)
On May 23, 2006, at 12:41 AM, Kris Leech wrote:
>> PS: Don't top post.
>
> I think by bytecode compiler he means something that compiles (ie.
> makes) bytecode. Its just mis-worded slightly... He said ruby 2 and
> that
> is supposed to support bytecode, were on 1.9 now, so not long to go :)

$ ruby-yarv -v
ruby 2.0.0 (Base: Ruby 1.9.0 2006-04-08) [powerpc-darwin8.6.0]
YARVCore 0.4.0 Rev: 497 (2006-05-07) [opts: ]

PS: Don't top post, no, really.

--
Eric Hodel - drbrain@segment7.net - http://blog.segment7.net

A: Yes
Q: Is top-posting bad?
  ? Derek Milhous Zumsteg
12271b6df73fe29930d65586be5a4a70?d=identicon&s=25 Dave Howell (Guest)
on 2006-06-01 20:39
(Received via mailing list)
On May 22, 2006, at 15:25, Eric Hodel wrote:

> PS: Don't top post.

And I was all ready to ask "What's top posting?" but happily finished
reading the message...

> A: Yes
> Q: Is top-posting bad?
>  ? Derek Milhous Zumsteg

What an incredibly elegant example. I love it. Although I personally
will not adopt the jargon, but will still admonish others merely to not
post the answer to somebody's question before posting the quoted
question. Mostly 'cause I probably won't remember the term next time I
need it.

And yes, this is a 97% content-free posting, but I just couldn't resist
jumping up and down, pointing at the example, and going "ook! ook!"
This topic is locked and can not be replied to.