Better to use dates in the format of yyyy-mm-dd it’s unambiguous. I
think there is even an ISO standard for this.
Ross (a colonial that has a date time format of dd-mm-yyyy)
Better to use dates in the format of yyyy-mm-dd it’s unambiguous. I
think there is even an ISO standard for this.
Ross (a colonial that has a date time format of dd-mm-yyyy)
“Ross” == Ross D. [email protected] writes:
Better to use dates in the format of yyyy-mm-dd it’s unambiguous. I
think there is even an ISO standard for this.
Calle D. <[email protected]>
http://www.livejournal.com/users/cdybedahl/
"I don't know what art these programs are state-of; possibly
macrame."
– Dr Richard A. O’Keefe, comp.risks
Rimantas L. wrote:
Better to use dates in the format of yyyy-mm-dd it’s unambiguous. I
think there is even an ISO standard for this.Yes, ISO 8601. I think Sweden is the only country in the world where
it’s in common use.Far from it: Implementation of the ISO 8601 Standard Around The World.
And I can add Lithuania to that list too.
Not sure what that’s a list of. It has Denmark on there, and I don’t
think I’ve ever seen the yyyy-mm-dd format in use here, so it’s probably
not a list of countries where it’s actually in common use.
Better to use dates in the format of yyyy-mm-dd it’s unambiguous. I
think there is even an ISO standard for this.Yes, ISO 8601. I think Sweden is the only country in the world where
it’s in common use.
Far from it: Implementation of the ISO 8601 Standard Around The World.
And I can add Lithuania to that list too.
This forum is not affiliated to the Ruby language, Ruby on Rails framework, nor any Ruby applications discussed here.
Sponsor our Newsletter | Privacy Policy | Terms of Service | Remote Ruby Jobs