Forum: Ruby on Rails typo 2.6.0 with vendor/rails

Announcement (2017-05-07): www.ruby-forum.com is now read-only since I unfortunately do not have the time to support and maintain the forum any more. Please see rubyonrails.org/community and ruby-lang.org/en/community for other Rails- und Ruby-related community platforms.
7a966bb1534f0ea863bc9ffe65ae449f?d=identicon&s=25 Jamie Orchard-hays (jamieorc)
on 2006-04-04 02:58
(Received via mailing list)
I noticed that the 2.6.0 Typo with vendor/rails has only migration
scripts numbered 1 to 9, while the tagged branch of 2.6.0 Typo has
migrations numbered 0 to 24. I haven't seen any notes about this.
Anyone know what's up?
5ce55767684e0cd1727db2b8b8975640?d=identicon&s=25 Steve Longdo (Guest)
on 2006-04-04 04:19
(Received via mailing list)
Might have something to do with the switch to BareMigrations that was
done
post-2.6.0.  Try asking on the Typo list.
0196ff65610046d2f8ba58bc4a45f144?d=identicon&s=25 Piers Cawley (Guest)
on 2006-04-07 19:30
(Received via mailing list)
Jamie Orchard-Hays <jamie@dang.com> writes:

> I noticed that the 2.6.0 Typo with vendor/rails has only migration
> scripts numbered 1 to 9, while the tagged branch of 2.6.0 Typo has
> migrations numbered 0 to 24. I haven't seen any notes about this.
> Anyone know what's up?

The tagged branch is not the distribution. No, I don't know why.
This topic is locked and can not be replied to.