Forum: Ruby on Rails Rails 1.1 and Rails 1.0 gems

Announcement (2017-05-07): www.ruby-forum.com is now read-only since I unfortunately do not have the time to support and maintain the forum any more. Please see rubyonrails.org/community and ruby-lang.org/en/community for other Rails- und Ruby-related community platforms.
B07c187ac858535358faa9365b66e657?d=identicon&s=25 John Tsombakos (Guest)
on 2006-03-28 09:17
(Received via mailing list)
Firstly, Congrats to the Rails team for the 1.1 release!

I installed Rails using the package created by Tony Arnold, referenced
here:

<http://tonyarnold.com/articles/2005/08/10/rolling-...

I did the upgrade to Rails 1.1 and all went well. Now, however, I seem
to have two sets of gems installed. Doing a 'gems list', I see:

actionmailer (1.2.0, 1.1.5)
    Service layer for easy email delivery and testing.

actionpack (1.12.0, 1.11.2)
    Web-flow and rendering framework putting the VC in MVC.

actionwebservice (1.1.0, 1.0.0)
    Web service support for Action Pack.

activerecord (1.14.0, 1.13.2)
    Implements the ActiveRecord pattern for ORM.

activesupport (1.3.0, 1.2.5)
    Support and utility classes used by the Rails framework.

rails (1.1.0, 1.0.0)
    Web-application framework with template engine, control-flow layer,
    and ORM.

Is there a way to remove the older versions? Should I just keep them?

Thanks!
9d7d8ef2179661d6b30e180fa588cd45?d=identicon&s=25 Calle Dybedahl (Guest)
on 2006-03-28 09:23
(Received via mailing list)
>>>>> "John" == John Tsombakos <johnt519@gmail.com> writes:

> Is there a way to remove the older versions? Should I just keep them?

"gem cleanup"
--
		     Calle Dybedahl <calle@cyberpomo.com>
		 http://www.livejournal.com/users/cdybedahl/
   "But that was in the gauzy realm of meat and oxygen, not this real
world
	       here on the screen." -- archbishopm, LiveJournal
B07c187ac858535358faa9365b66e657?d=identicon&s=25 John Tsombakos (Guest)
on 2006-03-28 10:06
(Received via mailing list)
On 3/28/06, Calle Dybedahl <rails@cyberpomo.com> wrote:
>
> "gem cleanup"

Cool, thanks!
This topic is locked and can not be replied to.