Greetings,
I’m trying to package Ruby without compiling the Tcl/Tk extension.
This is so I can install Ruby on a system without X11 or Tcl/Tk.
Examining the output of configure --help doesn’t seem to yield
anything obvious.
Thanks,
Scott
Greetings,
I’m trying to package Ruby without compiling the Tcl/Tk extension.
This is so I can install Ruby on a system without X11 or Tcl/Tk.
Examining the output of configure --help doesn’t seem to yield
anything obvious.
Thanks,
Scott
From: “Scott Parkerson” [email protected]
Subject: Compiling Ruby without Tk?
Date: Tue, 7 Mar 2006 01:04:38 +0900
Message-ID:
[email protected]
I’m trying to package Ruby without compiling the Tcl/Tk extension.
This is so I can install Ruby on a system without X11 or Tcl/Tk.
Examining the output of configure --help doesn’t seem to yield
anything obvious.
If you give invalid Tcl/Tk lib names, tcltklib may not be compiled.
For example, “configure --with-tcllib=none --with-tklib=none”.
Hi,
At Wed, 8 Mar 2006 23:37:06 +0900,
Hidetoshi NAGAI wrote in [ruby-talk:183087]:
If you give invalid Tcl/Tk lib names, tcltklib may not be compiled.
For example, “configure --with-tcllib=none --with-tklib=none”.
“configure --without-tk” should work with 1.8.4.
This forum is not affiliated to the Ruby language, Ruby on Rails framework, nor any Ruby applications discussed here.
Sponsor our Newsletter | Privacy Policy | Terms of Service | Remote Ruby Jobs