Matz has said that
a = (4
+5)
will be supported in 1.9.
Quoting Jim F. [email protected]:
Matz has said that
a = (4
+5)
Hmm. What about
a = ( 4 ; + 5 )
?
I won’t be heartbroken if it isn’t, but I’m just wondering about the
implications for the grammar…
-mental
[email protected] wrote in message
news:[email protected]…
Hmm. What about
a = ( 4 ; + 5 )
It should be a syntax error.
On Feb 27, 2006, at 2:03 PM, Mark W. wrote:
[email protected] wrote in message
news:[email protected]…Hmm. What about
a = ( 4 ; + 5 )It should be a syntax error.
Why? The semantics seem perfectly clear.
Quoting Mark W. [email protected]:
Hmm. What about
a = ( 4 ; + 5 )It should be a syntax error.
Ruby has an unary +…
-mental
Mark W. wrote:
[email protected] wrote in message
news:[email protected]…Hmm. What about
a = ( 4 ; + 5 )It should be a syntax error.
Why/how?
Hal