Forum: Ruby on Rails Rails 1.1

Announcement (2017-05-07): www.ruby-forum.com is now read-only since I unfortunately do not have the time to support and maintain the forum any more. Please see rubyonrails.org/community and ruby-lang.org/en/community for other Rails- und Ruby-related community platforms.
Aeac27d9f81191536d3c86ee825d71b2?d=identicon&s=25 Don Mc (dmcclean)
on 2006-02-27 15:17
It was said at one time that Rails 1.1 might be released in February. Is
that still likely?

Thanks,
Don Mc
Bc80625db60e9db4394c51d6c1892b49?d=identicon&s=25 Derrick Spell (Guest)
on 2006-02-27 15:49
(Received via mailing list)
Well, since tomorrow is the last day of February, I wouldn't hold my
breath.  However, there has been a flurry of activity on the core
mailing list this weekend.  Rails 1.1 draweth neigh...

-Derrick Spell
B13a9240291ffa22215214316bd365de?d=identicon&s=25 Hendrik Mans (Guest)
on 2006-02-27 16:59
(Received via mailing list)
> Rails 1.1 draweth neigh...

Is there by any chance some document available summarizing all the
(major) beautiful new stuff in Rails 1.1?

--
http://www.mans.de
38a8230ed3d5c685558b4f0aad3fc74b?d=identicon&s=25 Joe Van Dyk (Guest)
on 2006-02-27 19:49
(Received via mailing list)
On 2/27/06, Hendrik Mans <hendrik@mans.de> wrote:
> > Rails 1.1 draweth neigh...
>
> Is there by any chance some document available summarizing all the
> (major) beautiful new stuff in Rails 1.1?

svn diff http://dev.rubyonrails.org/svn/rails/trunk
http://dev.rubyonrails.org/svn/rails/tags/rel_1-0-0/


:-)
B13a9240291ffa22215214316bd365de?d=identicon&s=25 Hendrik Mans (Guest)
on 2006-02-27 19:55
(Received via mailing list)
> > Is there by any chance some document available summarizing all the
> > (major) beautiful new stuff in Rails 1.1?
>
> svn diff http://dev.rubyonrails.org/svn/rails/trunk
> http://dev.rubyonrails.org/svn/rails/tags/rel_1-0-0/

My question originally used the word "listing", but I replaced it with
"summarizing" because I expected that kind of reply. Thanks for not
disappointing.

So I take it the answer is "no"?

--
http://www.mans.de
5ce55767684e0cd1727db2b8b8975640?d=identicon&s=25 Steve Longdo (Guest)
on 2006-02-27 20:10
(Received via mailing list)
Here is an approximately 75% less annoying answer for you.

The individual rails "components" have ChangeLogs that describe what has
changed since the last "official" release.  You can have a look online
at:

http://dev.rubyonrails.com/svn/rails/trunk/actionm...
http://dev.rubyonrails.com/svn/rails/trunk/actionp...
http://dev.rubyonrails.com/svn/rails/trunk/actionw...
http://dev.rubyonrails.com/svn/rails/trunk/activer...
http://dev.rubyonrails.com/svn/rails/trunk/railtie...

It might be a fun project to write some code to parse these files
including
everything above a line that doesn't have * (date of some kind) * and
merge
them into a single file for consumption, or maybe that is the kind of
fun
only a masochist programmer would enjoy  :-)

-Steve
http://www.stevelongdo.com
B13a9240291ffa22215214316bd365de?d=identicon&s=25 Hendrik Mans (Guest)
on 2006-02-27 21:22
(Received via mailing list)
> The individual rails "components" have ChangeLogs that describe what has
> changed since the last "official" release.  You can have a look online at:

I'm aware of the availability of full changelogs. I did actually use
the word "summary" on purpose.

I've already understood that the answer to my question is "no". Since
I actually waded through the changelogs earlier, maybe I'll write
something up tomorrow. The naive little Rails lubber in me was hoping
that someone more familiar with 1.1 had already prepared something
similar.

--
http://www.mans.de
24d2f8804e6bb4b7ea6bd11e0a586470?d=identicon&s=25 Jeremy Kemper (Guest)
on 2006-02-27 21:40
(Received via mailing list)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On Feb 27, 2006, at 12:19 PM, Hendrik Mans wrote:
> I've already understood that the answer to my question is "no". Since
> I actually waded through the changelogs earlier, maybe I'll write
> something up tomorrow. The naive little Rails lubber in me was hoping
> that someone more familiar with 1.1 had already prepared something
> similar.

Hendrik, you may count on a "New in 1.1" update along with its release.

jeremy
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (Darwin)

iD8DBQFEA2LkAQHALep9HFYRAlMBAJ93jup8mcn/GOpR0xH/TCnrTfRH1QCg0rlb
WIPQrlY9yfl47xb6eWP0qSY=
=ubzT
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
B13a9240291ffa22215214316bd365de?d=identicon&s=25 Hendrik Mans (Guest)
on 2006-02-27 21:53
(Received via mailing list)
> Hendrik, you may count on a "New in 1.1" update along with its release.

I know. I was hoping for kind of a preview, since I know there are
people out there who've been working with HEAD and are somewhat
up-to-date on what awaits us in 1.1.

--
http://www.mans.de
89d967359903c639d31e4cad4569f537?d=identicon&s=25 Charlie Bowman (Guest)
on 2006-02-27 22:06
(Received via mailing list)
I know that no one knows the date, but does anyone know if we're getting
close to a release?




> Hendrik, you may count on a "New in 1.1" update along with its release.
>



Charlie Bowman
recentrambles.com
Bc80625db60e9db4394c51d6c1892b49?d=identicon&s=25 Derrick Spell (Guest)
on 2006-02-27 22:34
(Received via mailing list)
On Feb 27, 2006, at 3:50 PM, Hendrik Mans wrote:

>> Hendrik, you may count on a "New in 1.1" update along with its
>> release.
>
> I know. I was hoping for kind of a preview, since I know there are
> people out there who've been working with HEAD and are somewhat
> up-to-date on what awaits us in 1.1.
>

Well, I'm not a guru by any stretch, but I know that at least as far
as active record is concerned two big things are polymorphic
associations and the :through option on associations.  I'm pretty
sure that both of these features are explained in the wiki.  You may
want to have a pre-release look :)

-Derrick Spell
Bc80625db60e9db4394c51d6c1892b49?d=identicon&s=25 Derrick Spell (Guest)
on 2006-02-27 22:34
(Received via mailing list)
On Feb 27, 2006, at 3:57 PM, Charlie Bowman wrote:

> I know that no one knows the date, but does anyone know if we're
> getting close to a release?
>

Yes, we are... but you're right, no man knows the day nor the hour ...


-Derrick Spell
This topic is locked and can not be replied to.