>From the docs: "Note that any fields in the join table will override matching field names in the two joined tables. As a consequence, having an "id" field in the join table usually has the undesirable result of clobbering the "id" fields in either of the other two tables." I do have an ID field in the join table, and as a result it's clobbering the ID field of the associated table. It appears I can specify my own "finder_sql". Any other way? Perhaps a :select option would be nice? thanks csn __________________________________ Yahoo! for Good - Make a difference this year. http://brand.yahoo.com/cybergivingweek2005/
on 2005-12-24 21:54
on 2005-12-25 01:13
I take it there must be some other data in this join table that you're trying to keep track of--otherwise there would be no need for an id field. In that case, maybe you should think about turning the habtm relation into an intermediate Model, which has a belongs_to relationship with each of the original models. Somebody talked about that just a week ago or so on this list. Something like this, I think: class Reader has_many :readings end class Article has_many :readings end class Reading belongs_to :reader belongs_to :article end hth Brian
on 2005-12-25 01:28
The disadvantage to this method being that you can't do @article.readers or @reader.articles. Of course this will be changing with the introduction of polymorphic associations in the next version of Rails: class Reader has_many :readings has_many :articles, :through => :readings end class Article has_many :readings has_many :readers, :through => :readings end class Reading belongs_to :reader belongs_to :article end Brian Green wrote: > > class Reader > has_many :readings > end > > class Article > has_many :readings > end > > class Reading > belongs_to :reader > belongs_to :article > end
on 2005-12-25 17:27
On 12/24/05, Marc Love <email@example.com> wrote: > The disadvantage to this method being that you can't do @article.readers > or @reader.articles. Of course this will be changing with the > introduction of polymorphic associations in the next version of Rails: You can do it, just manually. (i.e. create the Article#readers and Reader#articles methods by hand.) It's what I'm doing now.