Hey! After some I'm trying to build JRuby (9000 - master) locally on a Linux box ... I seem to be getting not parseable pom's for the tesla-polyglot-maven-plugin ... tried deleting and re-downloading but it's kind of the same, anyone ? https://gist.github.com/kares/f0b363d94ff45ea844f5 mvn 3.2.1 - gave a quick try with 3.0.5 and got the same ... THX, K.
on 2014-02-28 13:59
on 2014-02-28 14:08
from the error in the gist it looks like the pom is html file. if I go to http://central.maven.org/maven2/io/tesla/polyglot/... is shows a valid xml and has not tags meta or head I am a bit irritated by http://repository.codehaus.org not sure where this comes from - at least we do not use it (anymore). do you have a profile active in $HOME/.m2/settings.xml ? - christian
on 2014-02-28 19:32
thanks - yes I had ... disabled and it went better ,,, I still use codehaus for jruby-rack releases, so for jruby maven releases it's no longer used than ? the latest release bubbled up http://search.maven.org/#artifactdetails|org.jruby... I guess it's still somehow working fine ... K.
on 2014-02-28 19:41
yes, we switch everything to oss.sonatype.org for jruby and dependent artifacts. mainly to keep things consistence and it is easy to setup. I am using jruby-rack-1.1.14 since two or three days. BTW jruby-rack-1.1.14 has a dependency to jruby-complete-1.6.8 which bit me.
on 2014-03-01 08:43
yep, the pom part has - I did not want to upgrade to depend on latest for now ... 1.1 is actually fine to work with all 1.6.x should not matter (for Trinidad/Warbler) unless of course you're building from mvn :) is that an issue (for you) ? feel free to report if you want me to so smt about it. the next release will be JRuby 1.7+ only ... hopefully will happen rather sooner than later, although no promises so far. I'll probably need assistance from you guys to be able to release with sonatype, right ? thanks, K.
on 2014-03-01 10:55
On Sat, Mar 1, 2014 at 7:42 AM, Karol Bucek <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote: > > yep, the pom part has - I did not want to upgrade to depend on latest for > now ... 1.1 is actually fine to work with all 1.6.x > > should not matter (for Trinidad/Warbler) unless of course you're building > from mvn :) is that an issue (for you) ? > actually it is not an issue, I first run into strange snakeyaml method not found errors, but just exclude the dep from jruby-rack. BTW with jruby-rack it is kind of trivial to pack a warfile for a rack application ;) > feel free to report if you want me to so smt about it. > > the next release will be JRuby 1.7+ only ... hopefully will happen rather > sooner than later, although no promises so far. > > I'll probably need assistance from you guys to be able to release with > sonatype, right ? > > I will prepare a little PR so you can use it whenever needed. for the deploy permissions you need to ask @headius and @enebo
on 2014-03-03 18:16
thanks again, it's fine with me :) ... assuming it works. but if you do there's a 1.1-stable branch, master should get a refactoring using tesla polyglot hopefully :) I mostly only worried about codehaus.org infrastructure going completely into the void ... hopefully it stays yet for a while around maven's. K.