Hi,
What can you tell me about Ruby that will completely change my vision
about
Ruby programming language?
Cezar
not a single thing. i have no idea what your vision is currently, nor
any
particular reason to want to change it.
On Tue, Jan 28, 2014 at 11:40 PM, Sîrbu Nicolae-Cezar <
On Tue, Jan 28, 2014 at 9:40 PM, Srbu Nicolae-Cezar <
[email protected]> wrote:
What can you tell me about Ruby that will completely change my vision
about Ruby programming language?
You can use Ruby to lure Catherine Zeta Jones into your unicorn petting
zoo, made entirely of Ruby:
On Wed, Jan 29, 2014 at 7:16 AM, Tony A.
[email protected]wrote:
The Least Surprised in "Time.now.is_a? MagicTime" - YouTube
–
Tony A.
<3
I heard ruby programmers get much beautiful dates. It does not work for
me
as I am mediocre!
It was built with secret alien techno freax deep inside a wormhole by a
bunch of overinflated linguists wearing group_on {|t| shirts} pretending
to
be overpaid mathematicians whilst marketing overpriced calculators under
the deep inflation of crowd sourced soft goods. Though I may not fix
your
vision it’s merely an inflection based approach to the negated reality
that
one who may ask for a simple truth may in fact neglect their own
intuition
of building the next context switch yielding a false sense of security.
On Tue, Jan 28, 2014 at 11:40 PM, Srbu Nicolae-Cezar <
So basically nothing.
Cu respect,
Sirbu Nicolae-Cezar
*[email protected] [email protected] | web
developer
| *+4 (0767) 508 109
NOTICE: This email and any file transmitted are confidential and/or
legally
privileged and intended only for the person(s) directly addressed. If
you
are not the intended recipient, any use, copying, transmission,
distribution, or other forms of dissemination is strictly prohibited. If
you have received this email in error, please notify the sender
immediately
and permanently delete the email and files, if any.
Despite the fact that everything is an object in Ruby, despite the fact
that Ruby has more than IF, ELSE, WHILE syntax such as UNLESS, despite
the
fact that you have a very minimal programming language, i think an
useful
answer was something like: “you can implement a singleton much easier”…
Best regards
On Mon, Feb 3, 2014 at 6:05 PM, Robert Klemmu e
On Mon, Feb 3, 2014 at 4:20 PM, Srbu Nicolae-Cezar
[email protected] wrote:
So basically nothing.
We do not know you. We do especially not know your “vision of Ruby”.
How should we know what will completely change it? How should we know
what kind of replies you are expecting? With such an open question
it’s basically impossible to come up with meaningful replies.
Usually it’s best to post more specific questions to get useful
replies - just because we’re not psychic and cannot read other
people’s minds. You could start by laying out what your idea of Ruby
is - and what you see critical if at all.
Kind regards
robert
But NOO, let’s make fun of the newbies. Thanks all for your constructive
attitude. You guys managed to take the fun out of Ruby.
Thanks
On Mon, Feb 3, 2014 at 6:10 PM, Srbu Nicolae-Cezar <
On Mon, Feb 3, 2014 at 8:12 AM, Srbu Nicolae-Cezar
[email protected] wrote:
You guys managed to take the fun out of Ruby.
Nah, I just checked the Fun Reservoir and it’s fully topped off.
Please proceed with your Monday.
On Mon, Feb 3, 2014 at 7:39 PM, Hassan S.
<[email protected]
wrote:
Hassan Schroeder | about.me
twitter: @hassan
You clearly don’t C# Hassan.
Please proceed with your life.
If are coming from other programming languages, there are few things in
Ruby that would change your vision about programming in general.
- Everything (with few exceptions) is an object in Ruby.
- There are tons of methods for objects like String or Arrays. Makes
your
life easier. - There is no real use of for loops in Ruby. Instead, the .each method
is
quite common. - If you haven’t used blocks or procs before, you will be simply blown
away by their functionality. - Classes are much simpler, cleaner, shorter and more configurable than
anything you might have used.
If that’s what you wanted to know, you could have probably mentioned the
background before.
But anyway, if that gets you interested, there is a really good intro
that
Josh C. few years back, called as Ruby-Kickstarter (available on
Github).
On Mon, Feb 3, 2014 at 10:50 PM, Srbu Nicolae-Cezar <
On Mon, Feb 3, 2014 at 8:09 PM, Micky [email protected] wrote:
- Classes are much simpler, cleaner, shorter and more configurable than
[email protected]> wrote:Please proceed with your Monday.
Awsome, thanks Micky!
Best regards
No worries. If you need to know anything else, feel free to ask!
On Mon, Feb 3, 2014 at 11:21 PM, Srbu Nicolae-Cezar <
Sirbu,
You are taking things too personally. But if you really read and think
very
careful about the answer provided by Robert K., you’ll find the
reasons
why there is no way to answer you question in a way that would make
sense.
https://plus.google.com/u/2/105762305556753404219?prsrc=4
On Mon, Feb 3, 2014 at 12:50 PM, Srbu Nicolae-Cezar <
Troll alert! Abandon thread!
On Mon, Feb 3, 2014 at 8:32 PM, Ruby S. [email protected]
wrote:
On Mon, Feb 3, 2014 at 12:50 PM, Srbu Nicolae-Cezar <
Please proceed with your life.
–
Ruby S.
Oh please you, shut up, your words doesn’t mean anything after you kid
around. I agree with the fact that the question wasn’t that precise, but
i
got my answer, so case closed.
Best regards
Cezar
The kid is also rude! LOL.
On Mon, Feb 3, 2014 at 1:39 PM, Srbu Nicolae-Cezar <
I can’t say for sure though it may be optional to consider how one may
deal
with exploring new dialects coming from an inferior closed minded view
of
STFU and GTFO opinionated implementation of HHOK to their own mis-guided
attempt to explore the domain problem… maybe this will help you for
the
next question : How To Ask Questions The Smart Way unless
the next question has no real value which one may derive any facts to
produce without error an actual determinate response.
On Mon, Feb 3, 2014 at 12:39 PM, Srbu Nicolae-Cezar <