Forum: Ruby uestion about ruby continuations.

Announcement (2017-05-07): is now read-only since I unfortunately do not have the time to support and maintain the forum any more. Please see and for other Rails- und Ruby-related community platforms.
Max Gonzih (Guest)
on 2013-11-26 15:19
(Received via mailing list)
Hi guys, I was playing with continuations in Scheme and decided to
port one puzzle from scheme to ruby. But it works in a different way.

Here is my code and explatations:

Can someone explain why is this happening?
Are there some limitations on how continuations can be used in ruby?
Abinoam J. (Guest)
on 2013-12-06 07:31
(Received via mailing list)
Hi Max Gonzih,


lambda do |yin, yang| yang {|cc| print "@"; cc }.call(callcc { |c| c } ),
         lambda {|cc| print "*"; cc }.call(callcc { |c| c } ) )

The path was:
1) A good explanation of the algorithm over here:
2) An explanation of Scheme "let" here:

Let is only syntactic sugar for an underlying lambda application:

((lambda (var1 var2 ... varn)
 exp1 exp2 ... expn)

And this made it easy for me to translate the algorithm into Ruby.

Best Regards,
Abinoam Jr.

PS: Run the "debug" version bellow and you will be able to see it "in

# "Debug" version
lambda do |yin, yang| yang {|cc| print "@ - #{cc}\n"; sleep 0.1; cc }.call(callcc
{ |c| c } ),
         lambda {|cc| print "* - #{cc}\n"; sleep 0.1; cc }.call(callcc
{ |c| c } ) )

Abinoam Jr.
Max Gonzih (Guest)
on 2013-12-06 09:45
(Received via mailing list)
Now I get it. Great job, thank you!
This topic is locked and can not be replied to.