Forum: Ruby Oniguruma -- when?

Announcement (2017-05-07): www.ruby-forum.com is now read-only since I unfortunately do not have the time to support and maintain the forum any more. Please see rubyonrails.org/community and ruby-lang.org/en/community for other Rails- und Ruby-related community platforms.
3af6542441e3065972b0825416b71f1a?d=identicon&s=25 rubyhacker (Guest)
on 2005-12-07 19:13
(Received via mailing list)
When does Oniguruma go into Ruby? I thought it
was "very soon" -- perhaps "already" -- but someone
said something to make me think it was "later."

Thanks,
Hal
4299e35bacef054df40583da2d51edea?d=identicon&s=25 James Gray (bbazzarrakk)
on 2005-12-07 19:42
(Received via mailing list)
On Dec 7, 2005, at 12:07 PM, rubyhacker@gmail.com wrote:

> When does Oniguruma go into Ruby? I thought it
> was "very soon" -- perhaps "already" -- but someone
> said something to make me think it was "later."

I believe the official story is Ruby 2.0.

This is because Matz is concerned about compatibility issues, I
think.  I believe he even offered to consider it sooner, if we could
put together a test suite that showed it wouldn't be too devastating
to legacy scripts.  (That's all from memory.  I could be wrong!)

This is sad, because it really is a heck of a library and I would
love to see it become the norm as soon as possible.

James Edward Gray II
Eb9493c94d8db9887e5f15284d2c767f?d=identicon&s=25 ptkwt (Guest)
on 2005-12-07 20:35
(Received via mailing list)
In article <218B55DD-37A0-4B3E-A4E8-AEABD515EA38@grayproductions.net>,
James Edward Gray II  <james@grayproductions.net> wrote:
>put together a test suite that showed it wouldn't be too devastating
>to legacy scripts.  (That's all from memory.  I could be wrong!)
>
>This is sad, because it really is a heck of a library and I would
>love to see it become the norm as soon as possible.
>
>James Edward Gray II
>

I believe you can use oniguruma now in 1.8.3 if you compile-in the
support for
the library.  I think instructions have been posted in the past.

Phil
4299e35bacef054df40583da2d51edea?d=identicon&s=25 James Gray (bbazzarrakk)
on 2005-12-07 20:35
(Received via mailing list)
On Dec 7, 2005, at 1:32 PM, Phil Tomson wrote:

> I believe you can use oniguruma now in 1.8.3 if you compile-in the
> support for
> the library.  I think instructions have been posted in the past.

This is true.  You can.  It's just not the default yet.

James Edward Gray II
A70b7da5a3a712e800100e61ef8d8917?d=identicon&s=25 akonsu (Guest)
on 2005-12-07 22:44
(Received via mailing list)
i am sorry, what is oniguruma?
4299e35bacef054df40583da2d51edea?d=identicon&s=25 James Gray (bbazzarrakk)
on 2005-12-07 22:48
(Received via mailing list)
On Dec 7, 2005, at 2:52 PM, ako... wrote:

> i am sorry, what is oniguruma?

A nice Regular Expression engine Ruby can use.  It's more full
featured than the engine used by default in the 1.8 branch.

James Edward Gray II
38a8230ed3d5c685558b4f0aad3fc74b?d=identicon&s=25 joevandyk (Guest)
on 2005-12-08 00:50
(Received via mailing list)
On 12/7/05, Phil Tomson <ptkwt@aracnet.com> wrote:
> >This is because Matz is concerned about compatibility issues, I
> I believe you can use oniguruma now in 1.8.3 if you compile-in the support for
> the library.  I think instructions have been posted in the past.

I think that's the right approach.  1.8.x releases shouldn't break
compatibility if possible.
This topic is locked and can not be replied to.