Forum: Ruby-Gnome 2 GtkSourceView gem?

B55d9706b57e8d286a4f198daf2ac69c?d=identicon&s=25 Andrea Dallera (edwin_bolthar)
on 2010-10-21 09:22
(Received via mailing list)
Hei everyone,

  is there a plan for a gtksourceview gem in the future? It would be
nice to
have it available without having to compile from source.

Thanks!

--

Andrea Dallera
http://github.com/bolthar/freightrain
http://usingimho.wordpress.com
Ee6ffca720cc428d70247dcd7377dd48?d=identicon&s=25 Kouhei Sutou (Guest)
on 2010-10-21 14:08
(Received via mailing list)
Hi,

In <201010210921.09889.andrea@andreadallera.com>
  "[ruby-gnome2-devel-en] GtkSourceView gem?" on Thu, 21 Oct 2010
09:21:09 +0200,
  Andrea Dallera <andrea@andreadallera.com> wrote:

>   is there a plan for a gtksourceview gem in the future? It would be nice to
> have it available without having to compile from source.

We are waiting for a patch for it!

Thanks,
--
kou
B55d9706b57e8d286a4f198daf2ac69c?d=identicon&s=25 Andrea Dallera (edwin_bolthar)
on 2010-10-21 16:57
(Received via mailing list)
Attachment: gtksourceview2.diff (70 KB)
Here you go! Would it be possible to have this, and the whole 0.90.3
stack of
gems, pushed to rubygems?

Also: it was a while since the last time I had to work with svn. It's
pure
pain. Would you consider switching to git? I'm taking care of porting
the
whole history.

Ja na!

--

Andrea Dallera
http://github.com/bolthar/freightrain
http://usingimho.wordpress.com
Ee6ffca720cc428d70247dcd7377dd48?d=identicon&s=25 Kouhei Sutou (Guest)
on 2010-10-21 17:08
(Received via mailing list)
Hi,

In <201010211656.59080.andrea@andreadallera.com>
  "Re: [ruby-gnome2-devel-en] GtkSourceView gem?" on Thu, 21 Oct 2010
16:56:58 +0200,
  Andrea Dallera <andrea@andreadallera.com> wrote:

> Here you go!

Thanks!
I want you to commit this to the Ruby-GNOME2 repository on
SF.net. Could you tell me your SF.net account? I'll add you
to the Ruby-GNOME2 project.

>              Would it be possible to have this, and the whole 0.90.3 stack of
> gems, pushed to rubygems?

Maybe yes but we don't have time to check whole libraries.
We need help for it.

> Also: it was a while since the last time I had to work with svn. It's pure
> pain. Would you consider switching to git? I'm taking care of porting the
> whole history.

I think that we should release 1.0.0 as soon as possible. We
can't consider about version constrol system change until 1.0.0.


Thanks,
--
kou
C838db9af1d90a87a828ecad8556b804?d=identicon&s=25 Guillaume Cottenceau (Guest)
on 2010-10-21 17:34
(Received via mailing list)
> Also: it was a while since the last time I had to work with svn. It's pure
> pain. Would you consider switching to git? I'm taking care of porting the
> whole history.

use git-svn. it's pure glory.

--
Guillaume Cottenceau - http://zarb.org/~gc/
Fc9157fcd1723fa6b0eb9b2f9ada4ae0?d=identicon&s=25 Phil Thompson (philthompson)
on 2010-10-23 00:10
Do you really need to port the history? I worked on project and someone
spent two weeks porting CVS history over to Perforce (don't ask) and no
one used it.

Maybe it's more important for open source projects but I'd just leave it
where it is. Unless there are tools that make it easier these days.

Great news on the gem though! Saves me a job :) Let me know when it's
available and I'll test.
0d130f179f85401f248e6ebc2ef8292f?d=identicon&s=25 Eric C. (eric_c)
on 2010-11-27 10:00
Any news on when the GTKSourceView Gem will be released to us?

Eric
Please log in before posting. Registration is free and takes only a minute.
Existing account

NEW: Do you have a Google/GoogleMail, Yahoo or Facebook account? No registration required!
Log in with Google account | Log in with Yahoo account | Log in with Facebook account
No account? Register here.