Forum: NGINX Upgrade nginx.net

Announcement (2017-05-07): www.ruby-forum.com is now read-only since I unfortunately do not have the time to support and maintain the forum any more. Please see rubyonrails.org/community and ruby-lang.org/en/community for other Rails- und Ruby-related community platforms.
Ca4434754828ea7640090ecdef528cea?d=identicon&s=25 Mark Maunder (Guest)
on 2009-06-05 01:30
(Received via mailing list)
This is a little silly, but shouldn't poor old nginx.net be upgraded
from nginx 0.6.31 to the current stable production release? ;-)
0de2f671d213ed51e615890465ea6097?d=identicon&s=25 APseudoUtopia (Guest)
on 2009-06-05 01:55
(Received via mailing list)
On Thu, Jun 4, 2009 at 7:23 PM, Mark Maunder<mark@feedjit.com> wrote:
> This is a little silly, but shouldn't poor old nginx.net be upgraded from
> nginx 0.6.31 to the current stable production release? ;-)
>

It is?

The development stable versions are nginx-0.8.0, nginx/Windows-0.8.0,
the change log.
The latest stable versions are nginx-0.7.59, nginx/Windows-0.7.59, the
change log.
The latest legacy stable version is nginx-0.6.37, the change log.
1d7e58690643fef4a92750ff39f4c56c?d=identicon&s=25 Kevin Worthington (Guest)
on 2009-06-05 02:08
(Received via mailing list)
He's saying the actual website's server software that is serving the
information about Nginx should be updated to the latest version of
Nginx.

--
Kevin Worthington
0847706937d26cc1377a447240e71d84?d=identicon&s=25 Eden Li (Guest)
on 2009-06-05 02:41
(Received via mailing list)
I think Mark meant the nginx that runs nginx.net:

$ curl -sI http://nginx.net | grep Server
Server: nginx/0.6.31
Ca4434754828ea7640090ecdef528cea?d=identicon&s=25 Mark Maunder (Guest)
on 2009-06-05 03:11
(Received via mailing list)
Thanks Eden and Kevin, that's what I meant.
2974d09ac2541e892966b762aad84943?d=identicon&s=25 Meng (Guest)
on 2009-06-06 00:08
(Received via mailing list)
Support upgrade. :-)

Posted at Nginx Forum:
http://forum.nginx.org/read.php?2,2636,2642#msg-2642
Ab1e128805502b007dd29966ca93273c?d=identicon&s=25 Francisco Valladolid (Guest)
on 2009-06-06 01:12
(Received via mailing list)
I think that's is the minus important in a web site that handle static
content in mas parts of the website.
I know people using 0.5 version of nginx yet.!

Regards.
0a09f8d706b212e7ec75cc84e9f561cd?d=identicon&s=25 Artifex Maximus (Guest)
on 2009-06-06 01:56
(Received via mailing list)
Right. "If It Works, Don't Fix It!"

BR,
Zsolt
This topic is locked and can not be replied to.