def test
puts ‘before’
yield 2
puts ‘after’
end
test do |i|
XXX if i > 1
a lot of code appears below
end
I have code above and wonder if it is possible to use
return/break/anything to stop execution of block and return control to
test() to execute code after yield. I know it is impossible in 1.8. How
about 1.9? Does anyone feel this is an important feature to have?
Thank you.
Guoliang C.
Guoliang C. wrote:
I have code above and wonder if it is possible to use
return/break/anything to stop execution of block and return control to
test() to execute code after yield. I know it is impossible in 1.8. How
about 1.9? Does anyone feel this is an important feature to have?
It is possible in 1.8, using the next keyword:
def test
puts ‘before’
yield 2
puts ‘after’
end
test do |i|
next if i > 1
puts “a lot of code”
end
Guoliang C. [email protected] wrote:
I have code above and wonder if it is possible to use
return/break/anything to stop execution of block and return control to
test() to execute code after yield. I know it is impossible in 1.8.
Why is it impossible? Doesn’t “break” do what you need? (And remember,
“break” and “next” can even return a value from a block to the yielder.)
m.
matt neuburg wrote:
a lot of code appears below
end
I have code above and wonder if it is possible to use
return/break/anything to stop execution of block and return control to
test() to execute code after yield. I know it is impossible in 1.8.
Why is it impossible? Doesn’t “break” do what you need? (And remember,
“break” and “next” can even return a value from a block to the yielder.)
Nope, break will skip the “after” line.
Joel VanderWerf wrote:
Guoliang C. wrote:
I have code above and wonder if it is possible to use
return/break/anything to stop execution of block and return control to
test() to execute code after yield. I know it is impossible in 1.8. How
about 1.9? Does anyone feel this is an important feature to have?
It is possible in 1.8, using the next keyword:
def test
puts ‘before’
yield 2
puts ‘after’
end
test do |i|
next if i > 1
puts “a lot of code”
end
This is great! I never thought of using ‘next’.
Thank you!
Keeping it simple:
def test
puts ‘before’
yield 2
puts ‘after’
end
test do |i|
unless i > 1
puts “a lot of code here”
end
end
There’s also throw/catch:
test do |i|
catch(:done) do
throw(:done) if i > 1
puts “a lot of code here”
end
end
Hi,
Am Freitag, 05. Jun 2009, 06:48:43 +0900 schrieb Joel VanderWerf:
Guoliang C. wrote:
I have code above and wonder if it is possible to use
return/break/anything to stop execution of block and return control to
test() to execute code after yield. I know it is impossible in 1.8. How
about 1.9?
It is possible in 1.8, using the next keyword:
Slightly modified:
def f ; puts “A” ; puts yield ; puts “Z” ; “F” ; end
f { next “X” ; puts “Y” } #=> “F”
puts “-”
f { break “X” ; puts “Y” } #=> “X”
The output is:
A
X
Z
A
Will this work in 1.9, too?
Bertram
Joel VanderWerf [email protected] wrote:
XXX if i > 1
Nope, break will skip the “after” line.
Right, sorry about that. m.