hi,
in 0.7.44 the auth_basic_user_file directive doesn"t seem to work
using relative path.
here is the part of the conf I used for testing.
location /c {
auth_basic “Authentication required”;
auth_basic_user_file users.db;
}
location /d {
auth_basic “Authentication required”;
auth_basic_user_file conf/users.db;
}
location /e {
auth_basic “Authentication required”;
auth_basic_user_file /usr/local/nginx/conf/users.db;
}
Everything has been compiled all by default.
Here is debug lines I have with each case
/c
2009/03/26 23:19:28 [error] 12347#0: *1 open() “users.db” failed (2:
No such file or directory), client: 127.0.0.1, server: localhost,
request: “GET /c HTTP/1.1”, host: “localhost:89”
/d
2009/03/26 23:19:54 [error] 12347#0: *2 open() “conf/users.db” failed
(2: No such file or directory), client: 127.0.0.1, server: localhost,
request: “GET /d HTTP/1.1”, host: “localhost:89”
/e
2009/03/26 23:21:01 [debug] 12357#0: *1 rc: 0 user: “toto” salt:
“btO5GKhJaEtBQ”
2009/03/26 23:21:01 [debug] 12357#0: *1 post access phase: 8
2009/03/26 23:21:01 [debug] 12357#0: *1 content phase: 9
2009/03/26 23:21:01 [debug] 12357#0: *1 content phase: 10
2009/03/26 23:21:01 [debug] 12357#0: *1 content phase: 11
2009/03/26 23:21:01 [debug] 12357#0: *1 http filename:
“/usr/local/nginx/html/e”
I’ll dig into 
++ Jerome
}
(2: No such file or directory), client: 127.0.0.1, server: localhost,
I’ll dig into 
it seems there is a bug in the function ngx_http_compile_complex_value
of src/http/ngx_http_script.c.
— src/http/ngx_http_script.c.orig 2009-03-27 00:53:18.000000000
+0100
+++ src/http/ngx_http_script.c 2009-03-27 00:53:33.000000000 +0100
@@ -148,6 +148,7 @@
}
if (nv == 0 && nc == 0) {
it works for auth_basic_user_file but I didn’t yet try other
directives or functions which can rely on this function. What do you
think ?
}
(2: No such file or directory), client: 127.0.0.1, server: localhost,
I’ll dig into
if (nv == 0 && nc == 0) {
it works for auth_basic_user_file but I didn’t yet try other
directives or functions which can rely on this function. What do you
think ?
or maybe more that:
— src/http/ngx_http_script.c.orig 2009-03-27 00:53:18.000000000
+0100
+++ src/http/ngx_http_script.c 2009-03-27 01:03:05.000000000 +0100
@@ -118,10 +118,6 @@
return NGX_ERROR;
}
-
ccv->complex_value->value = *v;
-
ccv->complex_value->flushes = NULL;
-
ccv->complex_value->lengths = NULL;
-
ccv->complex_value->values = NULL;
nv = 0;
nc = 0;
@@ -147,6 +143,11 @@
ccv->root_prefix = 0;
}
- ccv->complex_value->value = *v;
- ccv->complex_value->flushes = NULL;
- ccv->complex_value->lengths = NULL;
- ccv->complex_value->values = NULL;
- if (nv == 0 && nc == 0) {
return NGX_OK;
}
don’t know
On Fri, Mar 27, 2009 at 01:03:39AM +0100, J?r?me Loyet wrote:
}
(2: No such file or directory), client: 127.0.0.1, server: localhost,
I’ll dig into
š š if (nv == 0 && nc == 0) {
- if (nv == 0 && nc == 0) {
return NGX_OK;
}
don’t know
Yes, thank you, the second patch is better.
