Hey everybody,
this is my second message regarding this topic to rubyonrails-talk. My
first message is from last year. There has been a lot of progress
since then so I am asking again:
ScopePort is a free open source remote monitoring system with a Rails
web interface. We are searching for Rails developers to release a beta
version as soon as possible. Ernesto joined the team after my last
message and I hope to find somebody as cool as him this time again.
Check out http://www.scopeport.org/ for more information about
ScopePort.
Here is an installation guide for the development version that comes
directly from our git repositories:
http://scopeport.org/guides/full_install_debian
Thank you for your time! You can reply to this message or contact me
directly at [email protected]
So long
Lennart
On Wed, Mar 25, 2009 at 3:57 PM, [email protected]
[email protected] wrote:
Check out http://www.scopeport.org/ for more information about
ScopePort.
After looking over your screenshots, I have to ask… are you not
aware of Nagios? Why reinvent the wheel? Between Nagios and MRTG,
pretty much everything you’re doing has already been done.
–
Greg D.
http://destiney.com/
On 25 Mrz., 22:28, Greg D. [email protected] wrote:
After looking over your screenshots, I have to ask… are you not
aware of Nagios?
I am. And I worked with Nagios and Zabbix for years.
Between Nagios and MRTG,
pretty much everything you’re doing has already been done.
That is true. But it has been done I a way that did not satisfy me.
Best regards
Lennart
On 25 Mrz., 22:38, Greg D. [email protected] wrote:
Well what about Cacti, it was not suitable either?
http://www.cacti.net/
Hehe, I also took a look of Cacti. I think I got a pretty good
overview over FOSS remote monitoring software.
I mean, it’s very nice looking, was there something wrong with it as well?
Don’t get me wrong. I think most of the other projects are great
software! But they just did not fit my needs so I started writing my
own. …and from the Feedback I got so far I can say that I am not
alone with that opinion.
On Wed, Mar 25, 2009 at 4:31 PM, [email protected]
[email protected] wrote:
That is true. But it has been done I a way that did not satisfy me.
Well what about Cacti, it was not suitable either?
http://www.cacti.net/
I mean, it’s very nice looking, was there something wrong with it as
well?
–
Greg D.
http://destiney.com/