however, the result is an array having only one user for each os group.
I’d like to have ALL the users grouped by :os though
One solution is to write
User.find(:all).group_by{|u| u.os}
However, I wonder if it could be done within the “find” method ?
Not really. By definition if you group using the database then you
only get back one row for each value of the grouped column - that’s
just what group does in database and you want something else.
However, I wonder if it could be done within the “find” method ?
Not really. By definition if you group using the database then you
only get back one row for each value of the grouped column - that’s
just what group does in database and you want something else.
However, I wonder if it could be done within the “find” method ?
Not really. By definition if you group using the database then you
only get back one row for each value of the grouped column - that’s
just what group does in database and you want something else.
Fred
I see, thanks for that Fred.
Thanks all for the replies
a.
This forum is not affiliated to the Ruby language, Ruby on Rails framework, nor any Ruby applications discussed here.