Forum: Ruby on Rails How many people are using Ruby now?

Announcement (2017-05-07): www.ruby-forum.com is now read-only since I unfortunately do not have the time to support and maintain the forum any more. Please see rubyonrails.org/community and ruby-lang.org/en/community for other Rails- und Ruby-related community platforms.
F81bd9e06862af18b2c21c2d4a49d1df?d=identicon&s=25 Paul_Klipp (Guest)
on 2009-03-12 10:31
(Received via mailing list)
I enjoyed the Linux Counter (http://counter.li.org/) in the early days
of Linux adoption and so when we had some free time, one of my team
tossed together a little app for registering and counting Ruby users
and tracking Ruby adoption rates.

It's at http://www.rubyusers.com

If you think it's a good idea, please sign up. Or you could just do it
for the link back to your homepage, cv or blog.

If you think it's a bad idea, then I'm really sorry to have bothered
you.

All the best,

Paul

-------------------------------------------------------------
Paul Klipp, Certified Scrum Practitioner
Lunar Logic Polska
Agile Ruby Experts

http://www.lunarlogicpolska.com/portfolio

Do you use Ruby? Get counted!
http://www.rubyusers.com/
2c8973317fdf972875963b3927f1d587?d=identicon&s=25 m. jk (mjayakumar2k6)
on 2009-03-12 12:22
Paul_Klipp wrote:
> I enjoyed the Linux Counter (http://counter.li.org/) in the early days
> of Linux adoption and so when we had some free time, one of my team
> tossed together a little app for registering and counting Ruby users
> and tracking Ruby adoption rates.
>
> It's at http://www.rubyusers.com


sign up is big problem with CAPTCHAs
5f94b9b346c2aa648a80bc259978e5bc?d=identicon&s=25 Colin Law (Guest)
on 2009-03-12 12:29
(Received via mailing list)
2009/3/12 rails and rails only <rails-mailing-list@andreas-s.net>

> sign up is big problem with CAPTCHAs
>

Yes, it took me three gos to get the text correct.

Colin
Cad3d6c65cb93bd79273d02f17904648?d=identicon&s=25 David Nitzsche-Bell (Guest)
on 2009-03-12 12:36
(Received via mailing list)
What problem did you have? I had no problem at all.
5f94b9b346c2aa648a80bc259978e5bc?d=identicon&s=25 Colin Law (Guest)
on 2009-03-12 12:52
(Received via mailing list)
2009/3/12 David Nitzsche-Bell <zonker.in.geneva@gmail.com>

>
> What problem did you have? I had no problem at all.


I could not read the words. I tried the audio feed but that did not
recognise what I typed either.  The last letter is often truncated.
(Tried
on IE and FF, no difference).  Once I realised that there was a button
to
generate a new code it was ok, I pressed it a couple of times till
something
I could read appeared.  It would be easier if the words were simple
words, I
have just had another look and one of them is Trubenback, clicked the
refresh and one is volen with half a letter on the end that might be a
t, or
perhaps it is violent with the i mixed up with the v.

I am not normally deficient in the pattern recognition department as far
as
I am aware.

Colin
Cad3d6c65cb93bd79273d02f17904648?d=identicon&s=25 David Nitzsche-Bell (Guest)
on 2009-03-12 13:02
(Received via mailing list)
I guess I just lucked out. I tried again several times and I see what
you mean. In some cases the last letter was indeed truncated.

Well, I hope this gets addressed.

David
09b4d64ca074d04a272a713eb10319eb?d=identicon&s=25 Charles Johnson (Guest)
on 2009-03-12 15:31
(Received via mailing list)
On Thu, Mar 12, 2009 at 12:30 AM, Paul_Klipp <pklipp@gmail.com> wrote:

>
> I enjoyed the Linux Counter (http://counter.li.org/) in the early days
> of Linux adoption and so when we had some free time, one of my team
> tossed together a little app for registering and counting Ruby users
> and tracking Ruby adoption rates.
>
> Unfortunately, it won't take a valid email address. Mine is a
firstname.initial.lastname@vanderbilt.edu
Need to work on the e-mail regex! There are numerous examples on the web
for
e-mail regexes. Have a look.

Oh, and post when it is fixed. Thanks!

Cheers--

Charles
F81bd9e06862af18b2c21c2d4a49d1df?d=identicon&s=25 Paul_Klipp (Guest)
on 2009-03-12 16:00
(Received via mailing list)
So it seems we have to do two things ASAP: replace the Google books
capcha with a logical capcha (I just like the idea of helping with the
Google books project) and relax the email validation. The developer
probably did use a standard regex email validation script from the
web, but often those are not as friendly as those of us with unusual
email addresses would like (mine is @llp.pl, so I get busted from time
to time for not having a .com or .org email).

I'm sure we'll get it fixed soon. The developer was not in the office
today.

Thanks for the community-based testing. :)

All the best,

Paul
F81bd9e06862af18b2c21c2d4a49d1df?d=identicon&s=25 Paul_Klipp (Guest)
on 2009-03-12 16:08
(Received via mailing list)
I hate capchas, personally. We chose this one because at least it does
some good. As you use it, it improves the OCR of a book scanning
project. But as it's really a barrier to access, then I would prefer a
logical capcha to prevent bots creating accounts. A logical captcha is
something like "The sum of 4 and 8 is ________." They are always easy
to read, even for browser readers for the blind.

All the best,

Paul
This topic is locked and can not be replied to.