Forum: Ruby on Rails Versions?

Announcement (2017-05-07): www.ruby-forum.com is now read-only since I unfortunately do not have the time to support and maintain the forum any more. Please see rubyonrails.org/community and ruby-lang.org/en/community for other Rails- und Ruby-related community platforms.
149379873fe2cb70e550c6bff8fedd0c?d=identicon&s=25 Jeff Schwab (Guest)
on 2009-03-04 21:18
(Received via mailing list)
I'm using Rails 2.3 and Ruby 1.9.1 on OS X 10.5, and some simple things
are failing.  I can't believe I'm the only one who has encountered these
issues, so if anybody else is using the same tool versions, would you
please give a shout?
666257c0d92ec15d69ae0e865277d21d?d=identicon&s=25 khiltd (Guest)
on 2009-03-04 21:43
(Received via mailing list)
On Mar 4, 12:17 pm, Jeff Schwab <j...@schwabcenter.com> wrote:
> I'm using Rails 2.3 and Ruby 1.9.1 on OS X 10.5, and some simple things
> are failing.  I can't believe I'm the only one who has encountered these
> issues, so if anybody else is using the same tool versions, would you
> please give a shout?

I don't believe it's supposed to work on Ruby 1.9 yet.
81b61875e41eaa58887543635d556fca?d=identicon&s=25 Frederick Cheung (Guest)
on 2009-03-04 21:45
(Received via mailing list)
On 4 Mar 2009, at 20:17, Jeff Schwab wrote:

>
> I'm using Rails 2.3 and Ruby 1.9.1 on OS X 10.5, and some simple
> things
> are failing.  I can't believe I'm the only one who has encountered
> these
> issues, so if anybody else is using the same tool versions, would you
> please give a shout?

2.3 is only an RC and ruby 1.9.1 is rather cutting edge so a few
issues are out there (hence why it's an RC)
149379873fe2cb70e550c6bff8fedd0c?d=identicon&s=25 Jeff Schwab (Guest)
on 2009-03-04 21:48
(Received via mailing list)
khiltd wrote:
> On Mar 4, 12:17 pm, Jeff Schwab <j...@schwabcenter.com> wrote:
>> I'm using Rails 2.3 and Ruby 1.9.1 on OS X 10.5, and some simple things
>> are failing.  I can't believe I'm the only one who has encountered these
>> issues, so if anybody else is using the same tool versions, would you
>> please give a shout?
>
> I don't believe it's supposed to work on Ruby 1.9 yet.

Thanks; I guess I'm breaking new wind here.
149379873fe2cb70e550c6bff8fedd0c?d=identicon&s=25 Jeff Schwab (Guest)
on 2009-03-04 21:52
(Received via mailing list)
Frederick Cheung wrote:
> 2.3 is only an RC and ruby 1.9.1 is rather cutting edge so a few
> issues are out there (hence why it's an RC)

Fair enough.  I went with 2.3 because that's what the Rails Guides
cover.  I chose 1.9 because it's supposedly a pretty major upgrade.

I'm willing to deal with a few issues; in fact, it would probably be a
great learning experience to find & fix a few bugs.  At least this
explains why I'm not seeing reports of other people having the same
problems.
This topic is locked and can not be replied to.