Forum: IronRuby Git push

Announcement (2017-05-07): www.ruby-forum.com is now read-only since I unfortunately do not have the time to support and maintain the forum any more. Please see rubyonrails.org/community and ruby-lang.org/en/community for other Rails- und Ruby-related community platforms.
Ade8632553a9243ae05fc920f68644c1?d=identicon&s=25 Jim Deville (Guest)
on 2009-01-30 23:13
(Received via mailing list)
Sorry for missing the past couple of days, but I have finally pushed a
new revision to Github. As of this change (1ee05cdd), MERLIN_ROOT is no
longer required. You can now download it, get into a VS Command prompt,
and run rake compile from Merlin/Main/Languages/Ruby. Let me know if you
have problems.

Enjoy!
JD
3a9ff49a9e689dcbfc8242f05180cc31?d=identicon&s=25 Orion Edwards (Guest)
on 2009-01-31 01:02
(Received via mailing list)
The goalposts just got moved...

http://www.ruby-lang.org/en/news/2009/01/30/ruby-1...

Apologies if this is old news.

This begs the question, is IronRuby eventually going to target 1.9?
Any ideas on when or if this might happen?
68f1bd9e9a7d9d10f0278c6535f700fe?d=identicon&s=25 Michael Letterle (mletterle)
on 2009-02-04 04:00
(Received via mailing list)
Build is currently broken and it appears that MERLIN_ROOT is still
required?
68f1bd9e9a7d9d10f0278c6535f700fe?d=identicon&s=25 Michael Letterle (mletterle)
on 2009-02-04 04:37
(Received via mailing list)
FWIW, the major issue seems to be
Merlin/Main/Runtime/Microsoft.Scripting/Microsoft.Scripting.Build.csproj
not
including Runtime\BindingRestrictionsHelpers.cs

On Tue, Feb 3, 2009 at 9:19 PM, Michael Letterle
<michael.letterle@gmail.com
Ade8632553a9243ae05fc920f68644c1?d=identicon&s=25 Jim Deville (Guest)
on 2009-02-04 07:52
(Received via mailing list)
I just pushed again, fixing this error. I tested before I did the merge
to master, and apparently that merge got messed up. I have tested this
version before pushing.

JD

From: ironruby-core-bounces@rubyforge.org
[mailto:ironruby-core-bounces@rubyforge.org] On Behalf Of Michael
Letterle
Sent: Tuesday, February 03, 2009 7:25 PM
To: ironruby-core@rubyforge.org
Subject: Re: [Ironruby-core] Git push

FWIW, the major issue seems to be
Merlin/Main/Runtime/Microsoft.Scripting/Microsoft.Scripting.Build.csproj
not including Runtime\BindingRestrictionsHelpers.cs
On Tue, Feb 3, 2009 at 9:19 PM, Michael Letterle
<michael.letterle@gmail.com<mailto:michael.letterle@gmail.com>> wrote:
Build is currently broken and it appears that MERLIN_ROOT is still
required?
On Fri, Jan 30, 2009 at 4:48 PM, Jim Deville
<jdeville@microsoft.com<mailto:jdeville@microsoft.com>> wrote:

Sorry for missing the past couple of days, but I have finally pushed a
new revision to Github. As of this change (1ee05cdd), MERLIN_ROOT is no
longer required. You can now download it, get into a VS Command prompt,
and run rake compile from Merlin/Main/Languages/Ruby. Let me know if you
have problems.



Enjoy!

JD

_______________________________________________
Ironruby-core mailing list
Ironruby-core@rubyforge.org<mailto:Ironruby-core@rubyforge.org>
http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/ironruby-core



--
Michael Letterle
IronRuby MVP
http://blog.prokrams.com
E1deaac6561498a0e7472e6268ea9ccc?d=identicon&s=25 Jimmy Schementi (Guest)
on 2009-02-04 08:10
(Received via mailing list)
Don't worry everyone, I'll make a I-Broke-The-Build hat and make Jim
wear it all day tomorrow. =) That's if I remember ... which is unlikely.

From: ironruby-core-bounces@rubyforge.org
[mailto:ironruby-core-bounces@rubyforge.org] On Behalf Of Jim Deville
Sent: Tuesday, February 03, 2009 10:47 PM
To: ironruby-core@rubyforge.org
Subject: Re: [Ironruby-core] Git push

I just pushed again, fixing this error. I tested before I did the merge
to master, and apparently that merge got messed up. I have tested this
version before pushing.

JD

From: ironruby-core-bounces@rubyforge.org
[mailto:ironruby-core-bounces@rubyforge.org] On Behalf Of Michael
Letterle
Sent: Tuesday, February 03, 2009 7:25 PM
To: ironruby-core@rubyforge.org
Subject: Re: [Ironruby-core] Git push

FWIW, the major issue seems to be
Merlin/Main/Runtime/Microsoft.Scripting/Microsoft.Scripting.Build.csproj
not including Runtime\BindingRestrictionsHelpers.cs
On Tue, Feb 3, 2009 at 9:19 PM, Michael Letterle
<michael.letterle@gmail.com<mailto:michael.letterle@gmail.com>> wrote:
Build is currently broken and it appears that MERLIN_ROOT is still
required?
On Fri, Jan 30, 2009 at 4:48 PM, Jim Deville
<jdeville@microsoft.com<mailto:jdeville@microsoft.com>> wrote:

Sorry for missing the past couple of days, but I have finally pushed a
new revision to Github. As of this change (1ee05cdd), MERLIN_ROOT is no
longer required. You can now download it, get into a VS Command prompt,
and run rake compile from Merlin/Main/Languages/Ruby. Let me know if you
have problems.



Enjoy!

JD

_______________________________________________
Ironruby-core mailing list
Ironruby-core@rubyforge.org<mailto:Ironruby-core@rubyforge.org>
http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/ironruby-core



--
Michael Letterle
IronRuby MVP
http://blog.prokrams.com
E1deaac6561498a0e7472e6268ea9ccc?d=identicon&s=25 Jimmy Schementi (Guest)
on 2009-02-04 23:47
(Received via mailing list)
IronRuby is targeting 1.8.6 compatibility (modulo continuations) with
Ruby on Windows first. There are some Ruby 1.9 features which we have
designed IronRuby to support in future versions. This will eventually
happen, but 1.8.6 compat will need to happen first.
67b36dc8be45af469b4538f86bee144f?d=identicon&s=25 Nathan Stott (Guest)
on 2009-02-05 03:43
(Received via mailing list)
What are "modulo continuations"?  I've never heard that term.  I've done
very little ruby work but am interested in the topic.  I did a quick
google
and only things related to iron ruby came back when I entered modulo
continuations.

On Wed, Feb 4, 2009 at 4:28 PM, Jimmy Schementi <
Ade8632553a9243ae05fc920f68644c1?d=identicon&s=25 Jim Deville (Guest)
on 2009-02-05 07:44
(Received via mailing list)
IronRuby targets 1.8.6, except for continuations. We also will have
optional support for ObjectSpace.

JD

From: ironruby-core-bounces@rubyforge.org
[mailto:ironruby-core-bounces@rubyforge.org] On Behalf Of Nathan Stott
Sent: Wednesday, February 04, 2009 6:41 PM
To: ironruby-core@rubyforge.org
Subject: Re: [Ironruby-core] Ruby 1.9.1 stable released

What are "modulo continuations"?  I've never heard that term.  I've done
very little ruby work but am interested in the topic.  I did a quick
google and only things related to iron ruby came back when I entered
modulo continuations.
On Wed, Feb 4, 2009 at 4:28 PM, Jimmy Schementi
<Jimmy.Schementi@microsoft.com<mailto:Jimmy.Schementi@microsoft.com>>
wrote:
IronRuby is targeting 1.8.6 compatibility (modulo continuations) with
Ruby on Windows first. There are some Ruby 1.9 features which we have
designed IronRuby to support in future versions. This will eventually
happen, but 1.8.6 compat will need to happen first.
F983f0c990cba2fe743ef62a975ec99c?d=identicon&s=25 Curt Hagenlocher (Guest)
on 2009-02-05 08:15
(Received via mailing list)
"modulo" in this sense means "excluding" -- that we're not considering
the item.  Continuations are described at
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Continuation.  Implementing continuations
on top of the CLR would be pretty challenging, and (as I understand it)
they're not widely used in the Ruby community.

From: ironruby-core-bounces@rubyforge.org
[mailto:ironruby-core-bounces@rubyforge.org] On Behalf Of Nathan Stott
Sent: Wednesday, February 04, 2009 6:41 PM
To: ironruby-core@rubyforge.org
Subject: Re: [Ironruby-core] Ruby 1.9.1 stable released

What are "modulo continuations"?  I've never heard that term.  I've done
very little ruby work but am interested in the topic.  I did a quick
google and only things related to iron ruby came back when I entered
modulo continuations.
On Wed, Feb 4, 2009 at 4:28 PM, Jimmy Schementi
<Jimmy.Schementi@microsoft.com<mailto:Jimmy.Schementi@microsoft.com>>
wrote:
IronRuby is targeting 1.8.6 compatibility (modulo continuations) with
Ruby on Windows first. There are some Ruby 1.9 features which we have
designed IronRuby to support in future versions. This will eventually
happen, but 1.8.6 compat will need to happen first.
67b36dc8be45af469b4538f86bee144f?d=identicon&s=25 Nathan Stott (Guest)
on 2009-02-05 14:57
(Received via mailing list)
Hah, I've never heard modulo used in any sense except "1 % 6".  Learn
something new everyday.  Thanks guys.
This topic is locked and can not be replied to.