on 2008-11-19 20:00
on 2008-11-19 20:16
Chris Parrish wrote: > * Your idea here... > Probably way out on a limb here (blame it on the time), but how about keeping that 1 table for that 1 column! OK, before you relegate it to Junk Mail :) here's an explanation: If I remember correctly (and I may be completely wrong), SnS supports certain types of extensions? If that's the case, then it could be that all extensions using/ relying on SnS can assume the existence of this 1 table for storing information that is updated via callbacks and is intended to bypass all the other callbacks that you mentioned? (Even if you're not supporting extensions, this could be a model/ table that general extensions can use for storing exactly this kind of thing). Cheers Mohit.