Forum: wxRuby Which is more rich and easy, wxRuby or fxRuby?

Eb460fbf2920a94d448cba8169c8ba41?d=identicon&s=25 Rubyist Rohit (rpk2006)
on 2011-05-12 21:39
Which one is more feature rich and easy to use, wxRuby or fxRuby? Can I
develop a full-fledged client-server Windows based app. with wxRuby?
2aa32559134aa3d596fb749f8ffccde7?d=identicon&s=25 hendra kusuma (Guest)
on 2011-05-13 05:17
(Received via mailing list)
On Fri, May 13, 2011 at 3:39 AM, Rubist Rohit <lists@ruby-forum.com>
wrote:

> Which one is more feature rich and easy to use, wxRuby or fxRuby? Can I
> develop a full-fledged client-server Windows based app. with wxRuby?
>
>
Never use fxRuby
But yes, you can develop a full-fledged client server window based app
with
wxRuby
06f6780c99d4a8dd71f2b474082ea9ce?d=identicon&s=25 Alex Fenton (Guest)
on 2011-05-13 16:22
(Received via mailing list)
On 12/05/11 20:39, Rubist Rohit wrote:
> Which one is more feature rich and easy to use, wxRuby or fxRuby?

Easiness: just about the same. Featureness: Wx is a more capable toolkit
than Fox. It also looks better, in most people's opinions.

> Can I
> develop a full-fledged client-server Windows based app. with wxRuby?

Yes - there is a sample included in the distribution which gives an
example of client/server programming over TCP/IP.

a
This topic is locked and can not be replied to.